ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 361 guests, and 33 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Electra:

Only when of metal, these were nonmetallic raceways.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 138
W
Member
sparky,

I don't know...... I thought bonding was pretty clear. [Linked Image]


Dave
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
Websparky,
so did i until it was debated on the net, theory, intent and definition clash.

quite interesting to hear from those in the know.

not all bonding is grounded, so how would one identify this?

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
B
Moderator
The picture is a good illustration that practices and materials vary widely from place to place. IMO, those aluminum clamps look right-out scuzzy. A decent fault would probably send those through the concrete.

You know, there hasn’t been a new cable color in years… How about if we submit a proposal for clear GEC insulation for the 2008 Code? ;-)

Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
G
Gwz Offline
Member
Joe,

You hurt me by being required to cite the NEC.

Would you look at:

1992 TCR, page 176, Log # 703, Proposal 5-206 ?

Personnally, since it is not addressed in the NEC, I would say a covered or insulated GEC can be any color available to mark the GEC with.

Seems to violate 200.6 if White or Gray is used.

Just go back to the CMP partial statement of " Panel does not believe there is a need for identification by color - - -." , so white and gary can also be used for the GEC.

Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 507
G
Member
"Just go back to the CMP partial statement of " Panel does not believe there is a need for identification by color - - -." "

Exactly!!
Much ado about nothing.

GJ

Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 1
C
C-H Offline
Member
How about a sticker that says "GEC" or "To ground electrode"?

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
[Linked Image]

Here's an image from the JATC 2002 NEC Update, and they show a green, bare, and "gray" GEC!

OK, I am willing to accept the color green

PS: Paul Coxwell, I am sorry for the out of line comments I made on the other thread .... please forgive me!


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
P
Member
Joe,
Apology accepted, no hard feelings. I'm just trying to interpret what I've read in the NEC from an outsider's point of view.

Not directly relevant to the specific query, but by way of passing interest, our "code" in Britain has for many years explicitly specified that only the color green (later green/yellow) may be used for the GEC. That's the same as for equipment grounding conductors.

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5