ECN Forum Forums Code Related Discussion NEC & other Code issues Table 310.15(B)(6)

Hello Tom, now we have another controversy to the wording.

Let us know if you have any satisfaction with the formal interpretation.

As of right now and the wording provided, I don't agree with this person, (yes, I know he is a member of the CMP for this section) although the intent may be otherwise, it isn't written to reflect it.

This will take more than one question, and would almost take rewriting 310.15(B)(6) in a series of questions for any interpretation/s (note the plural) to put this to rest.

I have heard (hearsay only) that formal interpretations must be worded as YES or NO questions, this will cause confusion in itself.

BTW, I don't think parallel conductors are questioned since they are not mentioned in the table, and therefor could not be considered anyways.

Roger



[This message has been edited by Roger (edited 04-14-2004).]