ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 19
Recent Posts
fuse rejectors
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:44 AM
Old decora style outlets
by NORCAL. 03/29/17 01:41 AM
NFPA stuff
by gfretwell. 03/28/17 08:08 PM
Anyone hiring inspectors?
by HotLine1. 03/27/17 08:03 AM
ESA Arc flash course
by TheShockDoctors. 03/24/17 10:15 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
231,745 Are you busy
166,650 Re: Forum
160,799 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 65 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#82043 - 10/15/02 03:42 PM Existing Drinking Water Fountain  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
An existing drinking water fountain, or cooler is sometimes confusing to those who are not familiar with the NEC where they call for GFCI protection.

We know that 680.2 definition of a fountain does not include a "drinking fountain".

So what gives the right to a Safety Officier to mandate that they be GFCI protected on a government facility?



[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 10-17-2002).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#82044 - 10/15/02 04:02 PM Re: Existing Drinking Water Fountain  
walrus  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 680
Bangor Me. USA
Authority having Jurisdiction.


#82045 - 10/15/02 04:09 PM Re: Existing Drinking Water Fountain  
Electricmanscott  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 1,457
Holden, MA USA
Qualified answer? [Linked Image] Does a government facility fall under the NEC? Would this be an OSHA requirement? If strictly an NEC issue I would say the safety officer would have no right to require something such as this.


#82046 - 10/15/02 06:08 PM Re: Existing Drinking Water Fountain  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Quote
walrus
Authority having Jurisdiction.


Please explain what this means? See 90.4.

Electricmanscott:

I agree, and thought that the safety officier didn't have an NEC rule to cite.

What I mean when I ask for a "qualified answer" is a reply that gives an opinion such as yours.

I like to discuss the subjects that I post so that I can help with the questions that are asked of me "real time".

I expect that some of my students will join ECN, especially when they find out that their questions can be answered on this bulletin board.

Thanks


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#82047 - 10/15/02 07:11 PM Re: Existing Drinking Water Fountain  
walrus  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 680
Bangor Me. USA
My Understanding of the AHJ, the person or body that decides how the code(s) will be applied to a specific case. The final say in how certain code(s) get applied in their area of responsibility. The AHJ opinions must have some basis in fact and cannot be pulled out of thin air



[This message has been edited by walrus (edited 10-15-2002).]


#82048 - 10/15/02 07:55 PM Re: Existing Drinking Water Fountain  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
walrus:

That's what I thought you were thinking.

I also agree that the AHJ cannot, and should not pull or develop rules out of the thin air.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#82049 - 10/15/02 08:47 PM Re: Existing Drinking Water Fountain  
harold endean  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
Boonton, NJ
Joe,

Is this "Goverment" facility fall under Federal laws? Or maybe state rules? Here in NJ, the municiple inspector has no jurisdition with state or fed. buildings. Unless someone else owns the building. For example, if the Dept. of Motor Vehicle rents space in a local store front, then we would inspect the building. If it is a train station or post office, we are hands off.

Caper


#82050 - 10/15/02 09:09 PM Re: Existing Drinking Water Fountain  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,803
Brick, NJ USA
Joe:
The NEC is the "minimum" standards required for electrical installations; correct?
We as inspectors are mandated to enforce the NEC.
We as contractors are mandated to perform our installations to the NEC, as MINIMUM standards.

WE as contractors CAN exceed the NEC requirements; correct???
WE as inspectors CANNOT mandate standards that exceed the NEC; correct??

The "Safety Officer", may have the jurisdiction to mandate GFI's if he is not stating "they are required by the NEC".
Engineers and architects can specify installations that exceed the NEC; wire size, pipe size, "spec" devices; GFI's all over, etc.

The above is my humble opinion, as an electrical inspector, and an electrical contractor. (NJ licenses)
John


John

#82051 - 10/15/02 09:49 PM Re: Existing Drinking Water Fountain  
Roger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
N.C.
Joe, the term "safety officer" should be clarified.

Is this an individual such as a Home Inspector, where some are very knowledgeable and others are not, and maybe this person is the latter interpreting something wrong.

I know this may not be a qualified answer, but we know this is not a NEC requirement.

If this is an in house issue where he is employed, so be it, but I'm not aware of any codes that would require it.

Roger


#82052 - 10/15/02 11:40 PM Re: Existing Drinking Water Fountain  
sparky66wv  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236
West Virginia
Joe,

Could the "GFCI required 6' from sink" myth be rearing it's ugly head here?

Just a thought.


-Virgil
Residential/Commercial Inspector
5 Star Inspections
Member IAEI

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
richard
richard
L.I. New York
Posts: 94
Joined: August 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.016s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8164 MB (Peak: 0.9923 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-03-29 17:10:50 UTC