The Electrical Contractor Network

ECN Electrical Forum
Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals

Books, Tools and Test Equipment for Electrical and Construction Trades

Register Now!

Register Now!

We want your input!


2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Recent Posts
Parking lot pole light swap....
by JHellingElectric
Today at 07:02 PM
International Wire Colour Codes
by Texas_Ranger
Today at 08:24 AM
Son of Sparky
by HotLine1
10/20/16 07:43 PM
Speaking of Plugmold ...
by gfretwell
10/17/16 02:37 PM
Broken battery charger? Check for cobwebs!
by gfretwell
10/17/16 02:30 PM
New in the Gallery:
12.5A through 0.75mm˛ flex (just out of curiosity)
Shout Box

Top Posters (30 Days)
gfretwell 11
renosteinke 6
HotLine1 6
ghost307 5
Potseal 4
Who's Online
0 registered (), 230 Guests and 4 Spiders online.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Topic Options
Rate This Topic
#64401 - 04/06/06 03:49 PM bonding question
trekkie76 Offline

Registered: 06/19/04
Posts: 219
Loc: baileyville, maine, usa
Gentlemen, I have a question about a bonding scenario I saw today. Working in a new hospital, I walked by a row of sub panels, and the bonding caught my eye. The first panel in the row was feeding the next, and had a 2" ridgid nipple between them. On the end of each side was a bonding bushing with the wire just going through the nipple and bonding on each side. It was a punched hole, but I thought the wire should extend to the grounding bus.

In the electrical room, I looked at the panels in there and I saw a few panels with the same set up, but instead of the wire just going from bushing to bushing, they had on side bonded to the panel, and nothing on the other side.
I can't find anything in the book that says this is wrong, but it just looked wrong. Maybe its just another way of doing it. Any ideas? Gary

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Arc Flash Clothing, Gloves, KneePads, Tool Belts, Pouches, Tool Carriers, etc. etc....

#64402 - 04/06/06 04:09 PM Re: bonding question
Roger Offline

Registered: 05/18/02
Posts: 1779
Loc: N.C.
Gary it does sound a little odd but I can't see anything wrong either.

As an aside, they may have thought this was necessary to comply with 517.14 but it doesn't make sense to me.


#64403 - 04/07/06 09:45 AM Re: bonding question
earlydean Offline

Registered: 12/22/03
Posts: 749
Loc: Griswold, CT, USA
Grounding bushings connect a wire to the pipe. By connecting two grounding bushings on opposite ends of a nipple together, they were merely bonding one end of the metal nipple to the other end. Maybe they thought this was required because of the requirement for redundant grounding (bonding) in health care facilities. In any event what they did was useless. A green wire from one panel's ground bus to the next panel's ground bus would be redundant grounding (bonding) with the locknuts and metal nipple the other bond. What was done falls a little short.


ECN Electrical Forums - sponsored by Electrical Contractor Network - Electrical and Code Related Discussion for Electrical Contractors, Electricians, Inspectors, Instructors, Engineers and other related Professionals