ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
1 members (Scott35), 565 guests, and 35 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,723
Likes: 1
Broom Pusher and
Member
Quote


The way I do these is to install a triple lug on X0.
One conductor is the secondary grounded conductor (neutral).
The next conductor is the GEC.
The third is the bonding jumper.


I do the same as Electure, for the X-0 terminal.
When Parallel Feeders are used, then it's time for a 4 position Lug.

What really sucks for terminating to those larger Lugs, is when the terminal studs are sooooooo low and close to the bottom mesh of the Transformer - such as the Transformer we are using for this thread's example Guienna Pig.

Federal Pacific's Transformers have the terminations nice and high, which makes it soooooo much nicer to land large Feeders; whereas the typical GE, MGM and ACMEs are about 4" above the bottom mesh!

Quote


Okay- What are doing for transformer overcurrent?? I say we protect the primary at 125% of it's capacity and forgo protection of the secondary. If that's the case we can protect the primary at 125% x 90 = 112a. so we use a 125a overcurrent protection. gives me a #1/0 wire. Now we don't have to protect the secondary. This overcurrent protects the transformer. If we go over 125a. on the primary we would have to add secondary protection.


Not sure if we can use the Primary OCPD to protect the Secondary Feeders on this particular Transformer - as it is a 208/120 VAC Secondary - not a "Single Voltage Secondary".
I think this would be in Article 240, maybe something like section 240-3, and about ¾ of the way down through the list of items (Transformer Secondary Conductors' Overcurrent Protection).

Shooting from the hip here, as my code books are "Not Readilly Accessible At This Time"
(read: NEC and CEC books are in the Van; I'm too lazy to go get one at this time...)

Article 450 would only mention Primary or Secondary OCPD to be no more than 125% FLA - with certain exceptions, so there's no need to venture into the "400's" to reference this Secondary Voltage thingee.

Feel free to debunk this and reply with many, many swear words if I am wrong about the OCPD stuff.

Quote


. Question #2 is I cannot make out what is in the conduit on the bottom left side. It appears to be the gec. If so where is it terminated and would the bonding jumper sent to the bushing on that conduit entry need to be the same size as the gec?


Here's something overlooked so far - and a good question too!

Would the Bonding Bushing for the GEC's Conduit need to be bonded with a Conductor equally sized to the GEC, or will a Conductor sized similar to the EGC used with the Secondary Feeders be Okee-Dokee?
Would a "Wedge Screw Locknut" be acceptable, in lieu of a Bonding Bushing?
("Wedge Screw Locknut" = Locknut with a set screw cast into it at an angle, which is "Wedged" against the enclosure when the Locknut is completely set).

Bonding the Conduits for the Feeders is a No-Brainer (as far as sizes go that is!).

Blast away [Linked Image]

Scott35


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 167
S
Member
Remember when all xfmrs had the "no conductor zone" down low inside. I'm seeing more and more with the zone extending way high. Here is one:

edit: Posting the pics myself did not work. What it showed was the lugs at the top of the coils and the cable height sticker even with the lugs. A lot more room to work the cables.

[This message has been edited by sandsnow (edited 09-17-2005).]


Larry LeVoir
Inspector
City of Irvine, CA
Page 5 of 5 1 2 3 4 5

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5