I want to make it clear that I don't have a problem with fines being assessed for breaking things. My concern is about exactly how that is done.
Going back to basic Civics 101, our government, as originally designed, has three branches: the legislative, executive, and judicial. The legislature makes the laws. The executive puts the laws into effect. And the judiciary enforces the laws. This Separation of Powers is designed to help protect our liberty by preventing too much power from being concentrated in a single place.
The idea that was supposed to be enshrined in our Constitution is that when one is accussed of a crime, he is brought before the judiciary before a disinterested judge or jury, both sides have the opportunity to present evidence, the accused has the opportunity to confront his accusers, and said judge or jury renders a verdict.
This process has in the last century been corrupted by the creation of administrative agencies, such as OSHA and the EPA, that have the ability to function as lawmaker, judege, jury, and executioner. This is an unconstitution breech of the Separation of Powers required by our Constitution, and of the concept of limited government.
My concern here what that this corruption had further spread to giving private companies (even if "Publicly Regulated Utilities") the ability to levy fines. It appears that my specific concern was unwarranted, and that Harold simply misspoke.
(And I'm sure he was more concerned with making sure people know that one can get into some major trouble by digging into a line than he was in the Civics of the whole thing, so I'm not intending to pick on him.)