0 members (),
408
guests, and
18
robots. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
OP
Member
|
I don't know what the story is in Europe/Australia, but here in the Americas...we're still using lead/tin solder for electronics. There's some new EU directive in the pipelane which is supposed to be banning lead in solder completely from a certain date. Some suppliers seem to have already stopped stocking it already.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,498
Member
|
Yup - I think that date is going to be quite soon too - remember something like summer of 2006. Three guys one year ahead of me at school did a project "lead-free soldering of solar modules", and they weren't overly impressed of the new stuff either I think. Though they mostly blamed it on the early stage of development of must of the stuff they had to use.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
OP
Member
|
Yikes! I hadn't realized the deadline was that close, but it seems you're right: DIRECTIVE 2002/95/EC Member States shall ensure that, from 1 July 2006, new electrical and electronic equipment put on the market does not contain lead, mercury, cadmium, hexavalent chromium, polybrominated biphenyls (PBB) or polybrominated diphenyl ethers (PBDE). There are some exemptions listed in the annex, and a temporary reprieve for lead in solder for certain applications: 5. Lead in glass of cathode ray tubes, electronic components and fluorescent tubes.
6. Lead as an alloying element in steel containing up to 0,35 % lead by weight, aluminium containing up to 0,4 % lead by weight and as a copper alloy containing up to 4 % lead by weight.
7. ? Lead in high melting temperature type solders (i.e. tin-lead solder alloys containing more than 85 % lead),
? lead in solders for servers, storage and storage array systems (exemption granted until 2010),
? lead in solders for network infrastructure equipment for switching, signalling, transmission as well as network management for telecommunication,
? lead in electronic ceramic parts (e.g. piezoelectronic devices). Time to start stockpiling as much of the good old 60/40 as possible!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 206
Member
|
Trouble is, if I'm to believe what I've read in popular electronics mags', that lead free soldered joints subsequently repaired with leaded solder will be weak and unreliable.
Anyone know if that's actually true, or is it just propaganda from the enviromental fanatics ?
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,803
Member
|
Geoff, if I were designing a lead-free solder from scratch, I'd start with the basis of triple, quadruple or higher eutectic alloys of tin, adding perhaps antimony, bismuth, copper, lithium, etc. to get the melting point down. The problems foreseen would be conductivity of the solid solder, corrosive effects short and long term, liquid phases of the alloying metals appearing at the dendritic boundaries on solidification, mechanical strength of joints, ductitity, effective formulations for fluxes, actual melting temperature, clean melt with no pasty-stage as in plumbers solder; the list is almost endless. So if you re-solder a lead-free joint with tinmans' my guess would be it would be a poor joint, if only because the new alloy created would not be a clean melting eutectic but probably a wipeable joint! So, stocks of pb/sn will be ok for new work but for repairs .....
Alan
late ps. A quick shufti at my metallurgy books last night confirms that lead and tin alloy perfectly in all percentages without liquid phases of either metal appearing at the crystal boundaries, and that electrical solder [63/37] sits right on the eutectic- ie. the alloy percentage of lowest possible melting point, with a definite crisp solidification temperature similar to a pure metal. 176C/349F melting point, with good tensile, shear, elongation and creep properties.
[This message has been edited by Alan Belson (edited 01-29-2006).]
Wood work but can't!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
OP
Member
|
I'm more concerned about compatibility the other way, i.e. how would the lead-free solders mix with traditional lead/tin solder on older equipment.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 206
Member
|
Alan, Many thanks. Your knowledge of metallurgy is way above anything I ever attained, (never mind remember!). Does your ps indicate that modern lead-free produced gear will, in practice, be OK if repaired with standard old 60/40? I'm mostly only a hobby electronician these days, and one aspect that concerns me is that we won't actually know what's been used in manufacture. I suspect there may be frequent doubts in the commercial repair world too.
|
|
|
|
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,803
Member
|
Geoff, From what I can glean from the Net, most lead-free solders are /will be alloys of silver-tin, copper-silver-tin and possibly bismuth. The melting points are generally going to be ABOVE 217C, quite a big leap from 63/37. None of the many alloys proposed/patented appear to be true eutectics and thus will have melting point ranges of a few degrees, say 217-220C. The fluxes used will also be different formulations. No need for despair, you simply have to clean off as much of the lead-free solder and flux residues as possible from tags, pins etc, [there are little suck-pumps available, and the old wireman's trick of wiping with a sponge] & cut-short and re-tin wires if possible prior to resoldering with 63/37. The new solders, being predominantly tin, won't generate any problems with 'take' or wetting. My earlier comments related to attempting a repair with a large quantity of lead-free left on the joint- in this case a new alloy would be created of unknown properties. At a cleaned surface interface, [with a tag for example], a tin-alloy will still exist, [which may not even melt on resoldering], so it has to be clean [which is normal procedure anyway]. A reasonably cleaned off joint should re-solder very well with 63/37, [as long as you stockpile enough when it isn't sold any more!]
Alan
Wood work but can't!
|
|
|
|
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,498 Likes: 1
Member
|
I've read that some alloy of lead free "repair solder" is coming in. It is as good as the old one, but too expensive to use in mass production. Instead, cheaper solders with a higher melting point and less forgiving properties will be used for this.
We figured we might have chance at getting the industry to start welding instead of soldering. No such luck.
|
|
|
Posts: 57
Joined: August 2003
|
|
|
|