ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Safety at heights?
by gfretwell - 04/23/24 03:03 PM
Old low volt E10 sockets - supplier or alternative
by gfretwell - 04/21/24 11:20 AM
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 516 guests, and 17 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 2 of 2 1 2
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
You can have 'wave '. You put voltage on your Y-axis and time on your X-axis.
You get a sine wave.

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,236
Likes: 1
Member
Please consider this analogy...

Place two 1.5V cells in series with taps on all poles as follows:

(tap A)+CELL-(tap B)+CELL-(tap C)

From tap A to tap B is 1.5V

From tap B to tap C is 1.5V

From tap A to tap C is 3.0V

This could be considered a three wire 1.5/3.0V DC system, with the noted opposite poles, but without any phasing whatsoever.

Am I off base?


-Virgil
Residential/Commercial Inspector
5 Star Inspections
Member IAEI
A
Anonymous
Unregistered
>This could be considered a three wire 1.5/3.0V DC system, with the noted opposite poles, but without any phasing whatsoever.
I agree. And based on Scott's rotating magnet model, I am very happy to refer to 240/120 V as two pole rather than two phase.

That does not change the fact the if the voltages of the two poles are plotted over time, the waves are 180 degrees apart.

Indeed, acceptance of Scott's model requires that they be 180 degrees apart as one end of wave comes from the coil at the north pole and the other comes from the south pole.


[This message has been edited by Dspark (edited 05-21-2001).]

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
>So can I think of the 9V battery ... as an infinitely phased AC source as long as that makes more sense to me?
A 9V battery is not AC.
How many wires would it take for an infinitely phased source? Infinite.
How many wires do you have? Two.
Therefore, it could not be infinitely phased.

In DC current, actual electrons actually make the one-way round trip carrying energy to the load; whereas in AC electrons mainly slosh back and forth where they are pumping energy along.

Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
define RMS as pertains to peak to peak, i thought that this was 0 to peak

A
Anonymous
Unregistered
The RMS voltage is based on potential difference between the two poles. The actual potential difference varies between 0 when both waves are crossing zero to 340 when both are at their peaks. The RMS is 240 (nominal).

Don't confuse measuring potential between two coincident peaks of separate waveforms with measuring peak-to-peak (necessarily non-coincident) voltage within a single waveform which is something quite different.

For a single pole to neutral, the potential varies from 0 (zero crossing) to 170 (at peak).

Page 2 of 2 1 2

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5