Mike,
i've got stubs!
especially since 250 was [revised]
since the entire code has a continous line, how can one tell the changes from 96' to 99'? No, i don't mean the cross-ref appendix, i mean all the small, one-sylable-change-the-whole-meaning stuff!
Bill;
this, to me, is a good example of why 90-1 should be applied for lack of a code section. How many parrallel's does the NEC permit? It's not a good idea at all, it's a bad idea!

thanks for all the input guys, i'll pipe down now , maybe go have a brewski......

[Linked Image]