ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,809 Are you busy
169,579 Re: Forum
162,839 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 91 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#96437 - 11/28/05 11:53 PM Grounding Electrode Conductor  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Here's the situation- The contractor tapped the 400a residential meter can twice with Service Entrance conductors. Once with 4/0 Aluminum to feed a 200a Service panel and again with 2/0 Aluminum to feed a 150a Service panel. Then he installed a #4 awg cu. GEC out of the 200a Service panel and ran it to the water service. Out of the 150a Service panel he ran a GEC #6 awg cu to the water service. The water service is about 75 feet from the Electrical Service panels. What is wrong with this approach?


George Little

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#96438 - 11/29/05 01:17 AM Re: Grounding Electrode Conductor  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,069
Estero,Fl,usa
250.66 table says "Size of Largest Ungrounded Service-Entrance Conductor".

Then you read note 1 and it says

"Where multiple sets of service-entrance conductors are used as permitted in 230.40, Exception No. 2, the equivalent size of the largest service-entrance conductor shall be determined by the largest sum of the areas of the corresponding conductors of each set."

so it sounds more like you can have one GEC, but you size it to the sum of the 2/0 and the 4/0 (344Kcmil) rounded up to 350 which gives you a #2 copper GEC to the first electrode which could be tapped by the #4 and #6 going to each panel.

From a practical sense I am not sure what difference it makes.


Greg Fretwell

#96439 - 11/29/05 07:18 AM Re: Grounding Electrode Conductor  
Roger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
N.C.
George, the problem is the neutral conductors to each panel are in a parallel loop with thes two GEC's.

Roger


#96440 - 11/29/05 09:33 AM Re: Grounding Electrode Conductor  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Roger- I'm not sure I understand your statment about paralleled conductors if I take the purist difinition of paralled conductors as discribed in Article 300. As for Greg's statment, I agree with his calculation approach and that's the way I teach it. I like the illustration in the handbook (I know, I know) because it's clear and cost effective if your trying to save the customer money. Typically, I would see a number 2 coming out of the 200a panel going to the water service and a number 6 coming out of the 150a panel and being split bolted on to the number 2 external to the 200a panel right there at the electrical service location.


George Little

#96441 - 11/29/05 10:16 AM Re: Grounding Electrode Conductor  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,069
Estero,Fl,usa
Exhibit 250.28 is the paradox. If he put a 6" piece of #2 on the water pipe and tapped that for each panel it would look like the picture in the handbook but I would see that as a spliced GEC. (obviously I don't like exhibit 250.28)

The most elegant solution is to make the GEC connection in the meter base with a #2 but that is not what he did.

I do see the "loop" Roger is talking about but that exists in exhibit 250.28 too. I think one #2 in either service panel would satisfy 250.24(A)(1)


Greg Fretwell

#96442 - 11/29/05 11:14 AM Re: Grounding Electrode Conductor  
Roger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
N.C.
Hello George and Greg, this is what I'm seeing.

[Linked Image]

IMO the GEC should be a single point connection sized for a single service.


Roger


#96443 - 11/29/05 12:05 PM Re: Grounding Electrode Conductor  
Larry Fine  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
Richmond, VA
If you think about it, in places where landing the GEC in the meter is not allowed (because it's inaccessible due to the meter tag), there is no way to avoid paralleling the neutral with GEC's with multiple disconnects/panels.

In fact, with metallic service-cable conduits, the conduit itself always parallels the neutral. I wish we could use the meter's lug for the GEC, since it's already outside.


Larry Fine
Fine Electric Co.
fineelectricco.com

#96444 - 11/29/05 02:48 PM Re: Grounding Electrode Conductor  
Alan Nadon  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 399
Elkhart, IN. USA
George,
It would pass inspection.
Only thing "wrong" would possible be cost and minor waste of copper.
It is an alternative way of doing things.
Multiple services can use a single large GEC with permanent taps to the other services OR each can have a GEC sized for that service*.
As far as parallel pathes, having more than one Grounding electrode bonded together would mean parallel pathes,but only to ground (earth). [two rods six ft. apart]
Not a violation.
Alan--
*I have seen six GEC connected to the same ground rod, with seperate clamps, for a six unit apt. blding. Waste of copper in my opinion.
***Make sure he labels the service disconnects 1 of 2 & 2 of 2 NEC 230.70(B)



[This message has been edited by Alan Nadon (edited 11-29-2005).]


Alan--
If it was easy, anyone could do it.

#96445 - 11/29/05 07:10 PM Re: Grounding Electrode Conductor  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Just read 250.64(D) and I don't see a problem with doing it that way and what I noted is that the GEC "tap" conductors must extend inside the panels involved. So coming off the meter base don't solve the problem that Roger stated about parallel conductors. I'm still struggling with the fact that we are having a parallel situation here. I don't think it is a true parallel condition. We do have conductors that are both returning to the Xformer but the GEC is really just a back-up for the Neutral but even if we, for one fleeting moment, considered them in parallel the different sizes would violate 310.4. If the code considered them to be in parallel then I'd expect them to comply with 310.4.


George Little

#96446 - 11/29/05 10:05 PM Re: Grounding Electrode Conductor  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,069
Estero,Fl,usa
They get pretty serious about the parallel neutral deal here. If the GEC lands in the meter can there can't be a parallel path to the service disconnect enclosure (3 wire SEC in PVC is the norm).
On the line side of the GEC they don't seem to care since there is always some sort of parallel path, even if it is just through the dirt. I will usually see about 2-3a on my GEC and I saw similar currents on the #8cu that comes down the poles from the transformers around the neighborhood. Yeah I know, I have too much time on my hands. [Linked Image]

I am still not sure why he couldn't ground the service in one of the disconnects with a #2 and be done with it.


Greg Fretwell

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Member Spotlight
cookcc
cookcc
California ,Long Beach
Posts: 28
Joined: May 2007
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8216 MB (Peak: 0.9992 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-27 15:00:58 UTC