ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
twh 10
Admin 4
Recent Posts
Any UL 508 experts out there?
by jraef. 05/23/17 07:31 PM
Dryer, Range grounding from "Main" panel
by sparkync. 05/23/17 03:32 PM
Heat pump conundrum
by sparkyinak. 05/21/17 08:49 PM
Interesting week
by HotLine1. 05/20/17 11:57 AM
Electrical Pricing Guide
by ElectricianBud. 05/18/17 12:17 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
236,674 Are you busy
171,656 Re: Forum
164,631 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 58 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#90844 - 12/15/04 03:57 PM sizing of parallel feeders  
pip  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 15
Little Elm,Tx
if i have a 400 amp 3 phase service and i want to parallel the feeders from the 400 amp disconect to a 400 amp panel, what would be the min. size condutors i could use? I would also like to know how you came to this with 2002 nec ref..ect. thanks


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#90845 - 12/15/04 04:12 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,076
Estero,Fl,usa
310-16 pair of 3/0 copper @ 75c.


Greg Fretwell

#90846 - 12/15/04 04:38 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders  
pip  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 15
Little Elm,Tx
that is the same way i have thought however, i was told something different by a electric inspector today...He told me to go to 310.16
and find the wire size for 400 amps...which is 600mcm. then he said the total cir mils of my parallel feeders had to equal the cir mil of the 600 mcm...which means (2) sets of 300mcm..i need to show him this is wrong and why it is wrong...please help! thanks


#90847 - 12/15/04 04:56 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders  
Anonymous
Unregistered

First thing I would do is use his own logic against him. With your code book open to 310-16......"Well if that is the case ,sir. How would you apply this method to a 1200 amp service?"


#90848 - 12/15/04 05:02 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders  
pip  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 15
Little Elm,Tx
thanks...you guys are the best! i mean it.


#90849 - 12/15/04 05:17 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders  
Anonymous
Unregistered

One of the main reasons to use parallel conductors is to reduce over-all cost. Point this little number out to him as well. MCM size is not proportional to the amount of amperage it can carry. Take a look at the 75 degree column and compare 1500 kcmil to 1000 kcmil 625 amps as opposed to 545 amps. Gosh that extra 500 mcm bought me a whole 80 amps of extra capacity.


#90850 - 12/15/04 05:38 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Are all the conductors in the same raceway? This will impact on the ampacity of the system. I can't agree with any of the answer unless I know more details [Linked Image]


George Little

#90851 - 12/15/04 05:47 PM Re: sizing of parallel feeders  
Anonymous
Unregistered

Oh sure, George, muddy it up with derating [Linked Image]
My answer is per standard paralleling using separate raceways and following requirements of 310.4

Had the inspector used this "logic" to derate he would still be giving the wrong information.

[This message has been edited by kentvw (edited 12-15-2004).]


#90852 - 12/16/04 10:02 AM Re: sizing of parallel feeders  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Okay kentvw- you made me get the book out. I used the situation you discribe with 2 raceways. Used THHN insulation in a damp or dry location. Turns out that if you are required to count the neutral as you would for a wye, you are still okay with 3/0. 225a x .8 x 2 = 360 Round up to 400 per 240.4(B). If you install all the conductors in the same race way your in trouble 225a x .7 x 2 = 315 and round up to 350. I've used the code reference Table 310.15(B)(2)(a) The other inspectors approach was incorrect IMHO and I've never heard of his approach used by any instructor out there.


George Little

#90853 - 12/16/04 10:35 AM Re: sizing of parallel feeders  
Anonymous
Unregistered

George, Just because I have done something a certain way for years does not necessarily make it right.
Could you then comment on 310.15(4)(a) and also 310.15 (4) (c)
An electricians call? an engineers call?

Must admit that I did not considered derating in my earlier posts. [Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by kentvw (edited 12-16-2004).]


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
Niko
Niko
Campbell, CA
Posts: 356
Joined: August 2006
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8109 MB (Peak: 0.9852 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-24 02:17:45 UTC