ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,809 Are you busy
169,579 Re: Forum
162,839 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 91 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#88255 - 05/24/04 03:52 PM Pipe Heating tape  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Ok guys and gals, here's another question and this time I won't bring up the green screw issue [Linked Image]
If we are installing or inspecting a heat tape as described in Article 422 Section 422..50. Must it comply with Article 427 Section 427.22? And if so, would you accept or install GFCI protection as an alternate?


George Little

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#88256 - 05/24/04 04:04 PM Re: Pipe Heating tape  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
I think that 427.22 applies and that a GFCI provides more protection that what is required by the code so it should be permitted. However, if the length is long, the normal leakage current from the heat tape may cause the GFCI to trip. Remember that the nominal trip point of a GFCI is 1/6 of the trip point of the GFP protection required by the code.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#88257 - 05/24/04 05:00 PM Re: Pipe Heating tape  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
I think GFCI protection is not permitted because the article specifically calls for GFPE. From a practical perspective, a GFCI protected circuit would have nusiance tripping and would soon be replaced with only standard overload protection. GFPE is available in 30 or 50ma trip level and only in the breaker version. Cost of GFPE about $100 and cost of GFCI a fraction of that.


George Little

#88258 - 05/24/04 05:31 PM Re: Pipe Heating tape  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
George,
Have you made installations using GFCI and had problems? I don't see a nusiance tripping as a problem in a normal dwelling unit application because the heat trace length is too short. I also don't see that as a violation. The Consumer Product Safety Commission recommends the use of GFCI protection for heat tapes and in a mobile home 550.13(E) requires the heat trace receptacle to have GFCI protection.
Don


[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 05-24-2004).]


Don(resqcapt19)

#88259 - 05/24/04 09:19 PM Re: Pipe Heating tape  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Don- I have bee an inspector for 20 years and even when I wore the tools, I don't recall there being a need for GFPE or GFCI for heat tapes. I installed so few of them that I don't remember having a problem at all. Read your CPSC reference- Thank You- My comment would be that the CPSC is not up to speed with the current code on heat tracing. As to the Mobile Home setting, we are not sent to Article 427 for protection but instead ask for GFCI. This type of thing makes me crazy. GFPE is equipment protection and GFCI is people protection. I know you are aware of that and maybe 427 was intended for other than mobile homes. I do think that in other than moblle homes, Article 427.22 applies. Hope we get other comments.


George Little

#88260 - 05/24/04 10:49 PM Re: Pipe Heating tape  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Quote
Use a ground-fault circuit-interrupter (GFCI) wherever heat tapes are plugged in.

That is the part of the CPSC statement that I was thinking about.
The first GFP requirement was in the '87 code and only applied to heat tape that did not have a metal covering. The proposal called for GFCI, but was revised to GFP at the comment stage. The reason for the change was that on long industrial type installations that the normal leakage current would often exceed the 5mA trip point of a GFCI. In the 96 code the GFP requirement was expanded to cover all heat tape, even that with a metllic covering. This was based fires that were started by heat trace, even with a metallic jacket, when protected by standard breakers. 96 was also the year that 550 required GFCI protection for the mobile home heat trace receptacle. One of the substantiations said that 60% of the heat tape related fires occur in mobile homes. There were comments that recommended GFP in place of GFCI, but they were rejected. This same issue (GFP vs GFCI) was addressed again in the 99 code cycle with CMP 19 requiring the continued use of GFCI protection. The panel statement said in part "the panel's intent is to provide protection for personnel".

Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#88261 - 05/25/04 06:47 AM Re: Pipe Heating tape  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Thanks Don.


George Little

#88262 - 05/25/04 06:54 AM Re: Pipe Heating tape  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
One final thought- We are talking about heat tracing on pipes with a cord and cap connection and when we move to snow and Ice melting equipment as in roof tapes, we are back to GFPE if I;m not mistaken.


George Little

#88263 - 05/25/04 08:15 AM Re: Pipe Heating tape  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
George,

Quote
Hope we get other comments.


I hope you do too, this is an interesting question you raised.

I was thinking that as the requirement is for GFP we had an option of using GFP or GFCI.

Now I am not as sure, for ice melting equipment.

We are required to provide OCP that is adequate for the load so why wouldn't we be required to provide ground fault protection that is adequate for the load?

I know we use some type of GF for protection for all of this equipment and many times it is GFCI type for small sections of heat trace, it seems to work fine.

The larger jobs we use GFP breakers.


Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#88264 - 05/25/04 04:04 PM Re: Pipe Heating tape  
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
After doing some research and thanks to Don we have the CPSC suggestion, I find that based on 426.28 the mandatory word "shall" pops up and it looks like we will need GFPE for snow melting equipment. And back to heat tracing, I'll allow GFCI protection for heat tapes as used on mobile homes but that's it. I mean, where's the CPSC when you are in court defending the NEC?


George Little

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
cookcc
cookcc
California ,Long Beach
Posts: 28
Joined: May 2007
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.016s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8183 MB (Peak: 0.9949 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-27 15:00:40 UTC