ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
sparky 5
Recent Posts
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 04/30/17 02:30 PM
201 volt equipment?
by bigpapa. 04/29/17 12:15 AM
Schneider LC1D09
by jraef. 04/28/17 11:05 PM
Electrode boilers question
by annemarie1. 04/27/17 01:40 PM
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
235,042 Are you busy
169,884 Re: Forum
163,072 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 63 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#85466 - 07/07/03 07:05 PM 2005 ROP available now  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
The 2005 ROP is available for download now. Get started on your comments!!
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#85467 - 07/07/03 08:46 PM Re: 2005 ROP available now  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,878
NY, USA
Don,

If a proposal was rejected because supporting evidence did not acompany it can it be provided now with comments? Or is it too late for that?

Bill

[This message has been edited by Bill Addiss (edited 07-07-2003).]


#85468 - 07/07/03 09:03 PM Re: 2005 ROP available now  
dana1028  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
San Carlos, CA
...just slightly off topic -

Don - I had heard NFPA was going to provide access to older ROPs/ROCs via the internet.

Is this true? If so, what kind of timetable before these are available?


#85469 - 07/07/03 09:23 PM Re: 2005 ROP available now  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Bill,
I'm not sure, but I think that you can submit supporting evidence in the comment stage. I know that you cannot submit new or substantially changed wording, but as long as it supports the original proposal, they should consider it.

Dana,
I haven't heard that the older ROPs and ROCs were going to be placed online. It would be a good idea.

Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#85470 - 07/07/03 11:11 PM Re: 2005 ROP available now  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,878
NY, USA
Don,

My reason for asking is that I had submitted a proposal for an Exception to 210.8(B)(3) that would allow a Receptacle behind an Appliance (ie: Refrigerator) in Commercial Kitchen to be non-GFCI protected.
It was rejected for lack of substantiation.

My "substantiation" was that GFCI protection is not required behind Refrigerators in Dwelling Units and it is already recognized in 525.23(B) that some cooking and refrigeration equipment is incompatible with GFCI protection and therefore not required by that section. I thought that an established code section would provide substantiation for a proposal that (I thought) just asks for some consistancy among sections.

What are your thoughts? Was my reasoning flawed?

Bill

[This message has been edited by Bill Addiss (edited 07-07-2003).]


#85471 - 07/08/03 06:04 AM Re: 2005 ROP available now  
PCBelarge  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA
Hello Bill

For other than an appliance, what would the need for a receptacle be? Such as behind a refridgerator, which is not really accessible anyway, is it?

Pierre


Pierre Belarge

#85472 - 07/08/03 10:20 AM Re: 2005 ROP available now  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Bill,
Sometimes the CMPs are real picky about what they will accept. The nondwelling unit kitchen GFCI requirement has generated a number of proposals. I don't think that this issue will be completely resolved this code cycle.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#85473 - 07/08/03 10:34 AM Re: 2005 ROP available now  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,878
NY, USA
Pierre,

I'm not sure what you mean.
I thought that pointing to something already established/conceded in another area of the same standard would be a good substantiation, and an opportunity to get rid of another inconsistancy.

Bill

[This message has been edited by Bill Addiss (edited 07-08-2003).]


#85474 - 07/08/03 11:18 AM Re: 2005 ROP available now  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,878
NY, USA
Don,

I thought it was a good argument just on the basis of existing code sections. What do you think?

Bill


#85475 - 07/08/03 12:11 PM Re: 2005 ROP available now  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Bill,
I think that should be good enough, but apparently the CMP doesn't.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
dougwells
dougwells
kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 1,137
Joined: May 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8169 MB (Peak: 0.9940 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-01 00:26:13 UTC