ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
sparky 5
Recent Posts
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 04/30/17 02:30 PM
201 volt equipment?
by bigpapa. 04/29/17 12:15 AM
Schneider LC1D09
by jraef. 04/28/17 11:05 PM
Electrode boilers question
by annemarie1. 04/27/17 01:40 PM
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
235,037 Are you busy
169,878 Re: Forum
163,068 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 41 guests, and 7 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#85400 - 06/30/03 06:48 AM 250.32 Q's  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
Building A has a service w/GEC's, and a feeder is run from building B to building A (re; subpanel)

~does said subpanel need a GEC if the building already has one?

~if so, should GEC's from different x-formers be married together?

Quote
250.32 Two or More Buildings or Structures Supplied from a Common Service.

(A) Grounding Electrode. Where two or more buildings or structures are supplied from a common ac service by a feeder(s) or branch circuit(s), the grounding electrode(s) required in Part III of this article at each building or structure shall be connected in the manner specified in 250.32(B) or (C). Where there are no existing grounding electrodes, the grounding electrode(s) required in Part III of this article shall be installed.


[This message has been edited by sparky (edited 07-01-2003).]


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#85401 - 06/30/03 09:30 PM Re: 250.32 Q's  
txsparky  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2001
Posts: 552
Magnolia,.Texas U.S.A.
Quote
~ should GEC's from different x-formers be married together?

It is done all of the time. Consider a multi-story building where the building steel is used as the grounding electrode for all of the x-fmers in the building.


Donnie

#85402 - 07/01/03 05:54 AM Re: 250.32 Q's  
PCBelarge  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2003
Posts: 681
Dobbs Ferry, NY, USA
Sparky

Just a 'dumb question', if there is already service in the building why are you running a subpanel to it from another building? Just curious.

Pierre


Pierre Belarge

#85403 - 07/01/03 06:17 AM Re: 250.32 Q's  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
Pierre, economics....
the original service (5 meters) is a mess, and at the other end of a long building.

This feeder was available by way of an unsued meter/main nearby


#85404 - 07/01/03 12:17 PM Re: 250.32 Q's  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
sparky,
Are you in compliance with 230.2 and 225.30?
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#85405 - 07/01/03 05:18 PM Re: 250.32 Q's  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
Don,
it is a feeder, so 230.2 (i believe) would not apply, 225.30 OTOH...
Quote
225.30 Number of Supplies.
Where more than one building or other structure is on the same property and under single management, each additional building or other structure served that is on the load side of the service disconnecting means shall be supplied by one feeder or branch circuit unless permitted in 225.30(A) through (E). For the purpose of this section, a multiwire branch circuit shall be considered a single circuit.


would seem to consider outbuildings downstream of the main service, limiting the # of feeders or branch circuits per stipulations.

there are two building on the same property here, via the same owner, each has a service drop.

Building A is a large long 5 unit apt house w/barn.

Said barn is being supplied from building B's exclusive service, via a feeder to A


what am i missing?

~S


#85406 - 07/01/03 10:33 PM Re: 250.32 Q's  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
In my opinion, you can't feed a building that already has a service with a feeder from a second building. You need to check with the AHJ before making this installation. The code intent is to have a single source of supply for each building.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#85407 - 07/02/03 06:33 AM Re: 250.32 Q's  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
hmmm, well if it is pertinent,i believe the barn that is fed here has been ordered firewalled off from the rest of the building.


#85408 - 07/02/03 07:41 AM Re: 250.32 Q's  
Gwz  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 197
I agree with Don about a building having only one supply source.

BUT, what would happen if a 1 to 1 isolation transformer was installed in the feeder of a second source to a building. Would this be considered separately derived?


Article

100 Service
100 Feeder
100 Separately Derived System
100 Premise Wiring (System)
230 cover utility supplied
250 covers GROUNDING.

and probably other Articles.


#85409 - 07/17/03 07:07 PM Re: 250.32 Q's  
tdhorne  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 345
Maryland, USA
Take pitty on us poor jakes (firefighters) and at least clearly mark both disconnecting means to indicate the two supplies and their locations.
--
Tom


Tom Horne

"This alternating current stuff is just a fad. It is much too dangerous for general use" Thomas Alva Edison

Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
richard
richard
L.I. New York
Posts: 94
Joined: August 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.021s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8168 MB (Peak: 0.9891 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-30 20:44:17 UTC