ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by Potseal. 04/23/17 07:18 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
Electrode boilers question
by SteveFehr. 04/21/17 08:32 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,501 Are you busy
169,167 Re: Forum
162,511 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 58 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#83999 - 02/25/03 02:51 PM next higher breaker  
dana1028  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
San Carlos, CA
(1999 NEC) 240-3(b) is the "next higher breaker" allowed code section.

My code book is full of margin notes from various code classes and I see a note here: 'for branch circuits, not feeders'.

?? - I don't remember not being allowed to use the next higher breaker for feeders (I'm thinking for sub-panels). Is there somewhere in the code that prohibits the 'next higher breaker' on feeders to sub-panels?


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#84000 - 02/25/03 03:05 PM Re: next higher breaker  
caselec  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 558
San Jose, CA
You are allowed to use the next higher standard overcurrent device rating for feeders but not for multioutlet branch circuits feeding cord and plug connected loads. 240.4(B)(1)

Curt


Curt Swartz

#84001 - 02/25/03 03:30 PM Re: next higher breaker  
Elzappr  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
Oregon
In the 2002 code, art 240.4(C), when the overcurrent device is over 800A, then you have to use wire with allowable ampacity equal to or greater than the OC device rating. Maybe this is what your notes referred to...but this isn't likely something that applies to subpanels.


#84002 - 02/25/03 04:02 PM Re: next higher breaker  
wdelbusto  Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 3
Miami
Caselec gave the correct answer, the question dana1028 asked refers to OC/brakers etc.. and never mentioned wire size.?

:-)

[This message has been edited by wdelbusto (edited 02-25-2003).]


#84003 - 02/25/03 05:55 PM Re: next higher breaker  
The Watt Doctor  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 435
Mont Belvieu, TX
dana,
The "general rule" (for lack of a better term) is that you "go up" on branch circuits, and "down" on feeders. Elzappr is correct in stating the "800 amp" rule. At 800 amps and above the ampacity of the wire has to match or exceed the OCP. Notice the NEC Handbook.
Quote
Table 210.24 summarizes the requirements for the size of conductors and the size of the overcurrent protection for branch circuits where two or more outlets are required. The first footnote also indicates that the wire sizes are for copper conductors. Section 210.3 indicates that branch-circuit conductors rated 15, 20, 30, 40, and 50 amperes must be protected at their ratings. Section 210.19(A) requires that branch-circuit conductors have an ampacity not less than the rating of the branch circuit and not less than the maximum load to be served. These specific requirements take precedence over 240.4(B), which applies generally.

Table 210.24 summarizes branch-circuit requirements of conductors, overcurrent protection, outlet devices, maximum load, and permissible load where two or more outlets are supplied.
If the branch circuit serves a fixture load and supplies two or more fixture outlets, 210.23 requires the branch circuit to have a specific ampere rating that is based on the rating of the overcurrent device, as stated in 210.3. Thus, if the circuit breaker that protects the branch circuit is rated 20 amperes, the conductors supplying this circuit must have an ampacity not less than 20 amperes.


Good Luck,
Doc


The Watt Doctor
Altura Cogen
Channelview, TX

#84004 - 02/25/03 06:39 PM Re: next higher breaker  
dana1028  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
San Carlos, CA
thanks all - your comments are how I have understood it for years...just that comment in the margins threw me...don't know how that got there.



Member Spotlight
Joe Tedesco
Joe Tedesco
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Posts: 2,749
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.012s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7751 MB (Peak: 0.9211 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-24 05:32:42 UTC