ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
Video: Inventor of the GFCI self-testing shocks
by Bill Addiss. 01/17/18 09:36 PM
FPE in Germany
by HotLine1. 01/17/18 07:07 PM
VDE 0100 to introduce AFCIs
by LongRunner. 01/17/18 10:32 AM
Fujifilm Recalls Power Adapter Wall Plugs
by Admin. 01/16/18 07:04 PM
Air Compressor feeder conductor sizing
by Potseal. 01/15/18 09:08 PM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
SE cable question
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 16 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Would This Be True Today? #83995
02/25/03 10:55 AM
02/25/03 10:55 AM
R
rowdyrudy  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 169
Mascoutah, IL USA
This happened quite a few years ago (I seem to recall about 1966-67).
On a Chevron Chemical Co. site in TN, a 5kv direct burial cable was installed in PVC by the EC. Burial depth was 48”. He felt he was doing the owner a favor in that the cable could be replaced with ease. A few years later, the cable failed. When the lawyers got through, the EC, an upper medium size, was forced out of business. The bottom line was even though the owner OK’ed the installation the EC was liable as he should have known that the amp capacity of the cable buried in earth depended upon the effects of the earth being in contact with the cable. The installation in raceway derated the ampacity of the cable.

Rowdy

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Would This Be True Today? #83996
02/25/03 02:17 PM
02/25/03 02:17 PM
E
Elzappr  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
Oregon
Sure looks like it could happen today too. Looking at the code tables for medium voltage cable directly burried, there's lots of language about arrangement, ambient earth temperatue, thermal resistance, and conductor temperature....so how could anyone put direct burial cable in PVC without noticing such concerns?
Back in the 60's the code book (including Article 710) didn't have such language, and applying medium voltage cable would require some concern for what the cable manufacturer had to say about how it was used. There had to be SOME info about the ampacity of the cable...it certainly wasn't included in the code book...and so there must have been something printed up about it by the manufacturer or supplier. I'm amazed that the contractor didn't research this more.

Re: Would This Be True Today? #83997
02/25/03 04:07 PM
02/25/03 04:07 PM
S
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,342
moral of the story, don't do favors.

especially for the oilocracy
[Linked Image]

Re: Would This Be True Today? #83998
02/27/03 10:07 PM
02/27/03 10:07 PM
S
Steve T  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2001
Posts: 306
Oak Park, IL, USA
Couldn't the contractor just replace the cable for free since he made it so easy for himself to do by installing PVC?


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
SafetyWired
SafetyWired
Pa, USA
Posts: 44
Joined: July 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 22
Admin 20
Potseal 13
Popular Topics(Views)
243,530 Are you busy
180,332 Re: Forum
170,823 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.019s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9581 MB (Peak: 1.0887 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-01-18 04:07:20 UTC