ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
twh 10
Admin 4
Recent Posts
Windows 10, who's upgraded?
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 11:02 AM
How do you find a good employee?
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 10:58 AM
Recall notice: Bosch Solar panels
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 10:53 AM
Correct rotation, wrong sequence
by Potseal. 05/27/17 12:15 AM
Dryer, Range grounding from "Main" panel
by sparkync. 05/25/17 05:49 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
236,945 Are you busy
171,955 Re: Forum
164,837 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 55 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#83757 - 02/20/03 02:58 AM AFCI breakers  

I put 2-15A AFCI breakers in a panel yesterday. What exactlly is the reason for only useing them on bedroom circuits? Is this a fire safety reason? and how are they different than a regular breaker? I guess a regular breaker would not trip if an arc was produced. Thanks.

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#83758 - 02/20/03 08:08 AM Re: AFCI breakers  
sparky  Offline
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
do a search on this BB for 'AFCI', the debate is ongoing, and probably will be for some time....

#83759 - 02/20/03 09:09 AM Re: AFCI breakers  
Len_B  Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 53
New Hampshire

They work by electronically picking up the "arc signature" (voltage/current distortions). I think the "bedroom only" requirement comes from the unique nature of the "occupancy". i.e. for approx 16 hours a day the rooms are not occupied or "supervised", and when they are occupied the occupants are usually unconscious (I have a very boring life -- what a great set-up line though...). During the debate over requiring AFCI's, there were loads of stories about drapes, bedding, etc. hanging in front of receptacles, and catching on fire. Many electrical experts were sharply divided over whether they: worked as advertised; should be required; should be feed through device types vs breaker types, etc. My personal opinion is that they were shoved down the consumers throat by the insurance and manufacturing industries, who had everything to gain and nothing to lose. My personal rant on the subject can be read at the following thread: (Len Bonosevich)

Some links to info:


edit: spellin'

[This message has been edited by Len_B (edited 02-20-2003).]

#83760 - 02/20/03 01:46 PM Re: AFCI breakers  
cubby964  Offline
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 67
Nice rant, I'm with you 100%. I would like to look back at this situation in about 10 years, and see what difference these really make.
The fact that these things we have now (breakers) only protect against permanent wiring defects and not what 'holly homeowner' plugs in has really got "me undies in a bunch"

#83761 - 02/21/03 05:14 AM Re: AFCI breakers  
sparky  Offline
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
have you noticed the trade mag articles gaining clarity on specific's that were avoided a year ago?

manipulative bas****s...

#83762 - 02/22/03 12:46 AM Re: AFCI breakers  
Len_B  Offline
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 53
New Hampshire
The prime focus of trade magazines is making money selling magazines and selling advertising(not necessarily in that order). The freebie zines make it by selling advertising only.
The fact that they may provide competent technical information from "experts" is secondary, and only necessary as far as it supports the prime focus.

Quote: "...and this surprises you?"

Member Spotlight
Amish Country, PA
Posts: 46
Joined: March 2013
Show All Member Profiles 

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7753 MB (Peak: 0.9214 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-29 00:11:05 UTC