ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Electrode boilers question
by annemarie1. 04/27/17 01:40 PM
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,886 Are you busy
169,683 Re: Forum
162,921 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 77 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#83685 - 02/14/03 10:49 PM Terminal barrier strips instead of wire nuts?  
SvenNYC  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,691
New York City
Joe's thread on wire-nuts got me thinking (yes, that's a bad thing). What if we do what the Europeans do and start using terminal strips instead of splicing caps for some applications?

The advantage I see to this is that there is less damage to the wires being spliced (especially the cable in the box) and it's much easier to swap devices like light fixtures in and out. A deeply recessed set-screw (grub screw for those of you in the UK) holds the wires in place.

The blocks I'm talking about look like this:

[Linked Image]

I was wondering also if someone in NEC-land used these to wire in a luminaire instead of splicing caps, would they be violating any codes?

The disadvantage with these terminal blocks is that you can't pigtail a bunch of connectors together. You can only splice two wires together.

So this wouldn't work if you have to join each pigtail of a luminaire to a group of three wires each in the ceiling box. You'll need a splicing cap for that...unless there are special blocks with loop-through functions.

[This message has been edited by SvenNYC (edited 02-14-2003).]

[This message has been edited by SvenNYC (edited 02-14-2003).]


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#83686 - 02/15/03 01:09 AM Re: Terminal barrier strips instead of wire nuts?  
lighthouse  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 134
philadelphia pa 19125
SvenNYC...i think it all comes down to the price.one wirenut. 3 to 5 cents each. but i have seen these connectors around.


#83687 - 02/15/03 07:28 AM Re: Terminal barrier strips instead of wire nuts?  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
SvenNYC,

When you do a fire alarm in Rhode Island these are a requirement (actually it would be more accurate to say wire nuts are not allowed) and I use them for FA work in MA too, I like the fact that it's easy to get meter probes on and for installing end of line resisters.

As I usually have some in my truck I sometimes use them for other things.

If you need to tie more then two conductors together you can buy jumpers, more cost.

But to use them for all work seems like overkill to me.

For all we talk about to twist or not to twist I think the failure rate of wirenuts is low when you think of how many are in use.
Bob



[This message has been edited by iwire (edited 02-15-2003).]


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#83688 - 02/17/03 02:25 PM Re: Terminal barrier strips instead of wire nuts?  
C-H  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,497
Stockholm, Sweden
Quote

If you need to tie more then two conductors together you can buy jumpers, more cost.


I don't think I understood that comment. You can get three (or perhaps four) conductors per side, totalling six. By the way, what's wrong with using a wire as jumper?


#83689 - 02/17/03 04:14 PM Re: Terminal barrier strips instead of wire nuts?  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
C-H
The one in the picture that sven posted looks exactly like the ones I use, they will fit up to #12 awg, when I do FA work it is mostly #14 awg, 2 #14s would not fit in the hole and would be a violation of the listing. I also have ones that hold up to #8 awg
The ones I get come in strips of 12 pairs (24 holes) I would call the one in the picture 3 terminals (6 holes) only 6 wires total could be landed and only 3 of the 6 are electrically connected You break off
the number you need.


When you need jumpers they are a flat piece of metal shaped kinda like a comb, you break or cut off the number of jumpers you need these will fit in the terminals along with the conducter.

Doing Fire alarm work jumpers are not needed as we do not "T" tap anything.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#83690 - 02/17/03 05:14 PM Re: Terminal barrier strips instead of wire nuts?  
C-H  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,497
Stockholm, Sweden
iwire: I'm with you now. They need to be large to accept more than one conductor. (Here in Scandinavia a special type of these is sometimes used: It has only one screw and is open only on one side.)


#83691 - 02/18/03 08:20 PM Re: Terminal barrier strips instead of wire nuts?  
John Steinke  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2001
Posts: 518
Reno,Nv., USA
I am familiar with this system. Perhaps it is used in Canada- I'm told Canada doesn't allow the use of wire nuts.
These terminal strips differ from what we see in the US by coming in long "blocks"; you break off and use as many ports as you need. There are (noninsulated) "combs" that you use to jumper adjacent ports together.
Usually, the terminal strips are free-floating; that is, not anchored to the enclosure.
Some of the appliances from Europe will come with these. I have no problem in using them.


#83692 - 02/18/03 09:12 PM Re: Terminal barrier strips instead of wire nuts?  
cubby964  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 67
USA
John:
If these "combs" are uninsulated, and the connectors are free floating, how are they kept from contact with the enclosure?

I have used the US type, secured to a surface, for low voltage stuff with the jumpers, for years. But, these don't move when they are fastened.

If you have to tape them up with the jumpers in, what is the advantage over wire nuts? Are there no insulated jumpers available?

Just asking the questions.


#83693 - 02/18/03 09:53 PM Re: Terminal barrier strips instead of wire nuts?  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
I float these in a box for FA work but as I said we do not use the jumpers.

Times I have used the jumpers it would be in a control cabinet like a compactor control or other motor control work and I would screw them down, the one in the picture has holes for this between each terminal.

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#83694 - 02/19/03 12:24 AM Re: Terminal barrier strips instead of wire nuts?  
electric-ed  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 175
Canada
Quote
I'm told Canada doesn't allow the use of wire nuts.

Not true. Canada uses the same wiring methods and materials as the USA.

Ed


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
Posts: 362
Joined: April 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 15 (0.002s) Memory: 0.8197 MB (Peak: 0.9943 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-28 20:00:19 UTC