ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
twh 10
Admin 4
Recent Posts
Windows 10, who's upgraded?
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 11:02 AM
How do you find a good employee?
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 10:58 AM
Recall notice: Bosch Solar panels
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 10:53 AM
Correct rotation, wrong sequence
by Potseal. 05/27/17 12:15 AM
Dryer, Range grounding from "Main" panel
by sparkync. 05/25/17 05:49 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
236,925 Are you busy
171,937 Re: Forum
164,818 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 51 guests, and 13 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 2 1 2
#83097 - 01/09/03 09:07 PM Inspectors strange interpretation  
Roger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
N.C.
I posted this at the M.H. forum also.

Talking to another electrician today who works in another area.

He tells me there is an inspector in this area, who says, when using NM in a commercial building, the NM in attics and basements must be enclosed on both sides, within 15 minute finish rating in living area and attic or basement area.

He said the inspector is using (twisting in my oppinion) the wording of 334.10(3).

I proceeded to tell him I was glad we do zilch in NM work and don't work in this area.

After thinking about it,I thought I would see what oppinions would come up here.

Roger


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#83098 - 01/09/03 10:51 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation  
spyder  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 210
Massachusetts
I have never run into this before, but he may have a point after reading 334.10(3). Learn something new everyday. I almost always use MC cable anyway for commercial.


#83099 - 01/13/03 05:31 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
requiring all residential basements to have a 15 min. fire rating would be a stretch...but what trade would he come down on?


#83100 - 01/13/03 11:06 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation  
rmiell  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 242
La Junta, Co. USA
Why on both sides? Doesn't 1/2" sheetrock provide a 15 minute rating? Or is it 3/4"? Either way, if this rated material meets the requirement of a 15 minute barrier, anything on the other side has no effect.

Rick Miell


#83101 - 01/15/03 09:13 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,826
Brick, NJ USA
Clue me in guys:
Quote from above:
"He tells me there is an inspector in this area, who says, when using NM in a commercial building, the NM in attics and basements must be enclosed on both sides, within 15 minute finish rating in living area and attic or basement area."

Are we saying above that the ceilings must be 15 min. fire rated: and the "floors have to be 15 min fire rated also??

Or to put it another way:
OPen joist ceilings, or attic floors CANNOT have NMC wiring???

1/2" sheetrock is at least a 15 min fire rating. 2 layers of 5/8" make a 1 hour wall I believe. Tommorow, I have to ask the Building Inspector, and the Electric Sub-Code Official (Head Inspector) for clarifications.

John


John

#83102 - 01/16/03 05:35 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
well good luck John,
somehow insinuating mc cable for residential wiring reeks of that steel tube institute's vengance on the 3 strory nm deal.... [Linked Image]


#83103 - 01/16/03 11:31 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,826
Brick, NJ USA
The clarifications will have to wait until Tuesday evening, as both gentlemen where "out" today, & I don't go back 'till Tuesday
John


John

#83104 - 01/17/03 09:06 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation  
Roger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
N.C.
I hate it when somebody or an inspector uses (in their oppinion) the "thats not the intent" clause.

But in this case, the pure wording of 334.10{3}, IMO, is not the intent. [Linked Image]

Roger


#83105 - 01/19/03 06:21 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation  
harold endean  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
Boonton, NJ
I am reading the IAEI "Analysis of the 2002 NEC" book and on page 185 in reference to 334.10 it says "Type NM, Type NMC and Type NMS cables shall be permitted to be used in the following:

(1) One- and Two-family dwellings.

(2) Multifamily dwellings permitted to be of Types III, IV, and V construction except as prohibited in 334.12

(3) Other structures permitted to be of Types III, IV, and Type V construction except as prohibitied in 334.12. Cables shall be concealed within walls, floors or ceilings that provide a thermal barrier of material that has at least a 15-minute rating as identified in listings of fire-rated assemblies."


Does this help?


#83106 - 01/19/03 09:23 PM Re: Inspectors strange interpretation  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,308
a 15 min f-rating to protect the dwelling or the dwellings occupants??


Page 1 of 2 1 2

Member Spotlight
lil suzi
lil suzi
Midwest
Posts: 57
Joined: August 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.8177 MB (Peak: 0.9905 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-28 10:30:32 UTC