ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 10
Admin 5
Recent Posts
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:14 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
Electrode boilers question
by SteveFehr. 04/21/17 08:32 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,477 Are you busy
169,092 Re: Forum
162,478 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 41 guests, and 7 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4
#82955 - 12/26/02 02:57 PM Joe --- Please don't yell  
George  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 375
I appreciate your view on the usage of extension cords.

You quoted the NFPA. In that quote UL certification is disparaged. There are few finer groups than UL. Perhaps the NFPA should blame the testing standards rather than the testers.

Please note that:

The NFPA comments are not part of the NEC.

The NEC stops at the outlet.

The NEC and NFPA have no authority over what is plugged into an outlet. In particular, the number of extension cords between the outlet and the appliance is a matter of the users purpose not an electrictians.


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#82956 - 12/26/02 05:44 PM Re: Joe --- Please don't yell  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
[Linked Image]

[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 12-28-2002).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#82957 - 12/26/02 05:58 PM Re: Joe --- Please don't yell  
spyder  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 210
Massachusetts
Don't we have code minimums for example of the number of recptacles, locations of required recptacles) so the need for the use of extension cords is limited? Lets face it many electrical hazards occur do to the misuse of extension cords.


#82958 - 12/26/02 11:21 PM Re: Joe --- Please don't yell  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,808
Brick, NJ USA
The key word in Spyders comments is "mis-use"

I agree with Spyder wholeheartedly that there are many electrical hazards caused by mis-use of a lot of things....

How about the 30 amp plug fuses, "cause they last longer"
How about the piece of copper pipe "cause the damn fuses keep blowing"
How about the "bigger circuit breaker, cause the one marked 15 shuts off by itself"
How about the zip cord hard wired to a device box, from an existing box????
And it goes on and on!!!!

Please read my comments in Joe's extension cord thread also.

Oh NO, that thread is closed and locked....someone must have made someone mad or angry....

Guys if it was my post, please let me know.

John

[This message has been edited by HotLine1 (edited 12-26-2002).]


John

#82959 - 12/26/02 11:30 PM Re: Joe --- Please don't yell  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
The thread was closed because of my error when I moved it from the violations area to the NEC area.

[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 12-28-2002).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#82960 - 12/27/02 05:36 PM Re: Joe --- Please don't yell  
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,306
If extention cord 'abuse' is an issue, why are manufacturers continued to be allowed to produce those of minimal design?

Would it not be prudent to lessen the potential hazard & allow minimal #14 3-wire cords only?


#82961 - 12/27/02 06:35 PM Re: Joe --- Please don't yell  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,808
Brick, NJ USA
Sparky:
Damn, now that's a real good idea!
Only problem is who and how do you have to convince.

I recently came upon a few brown 12' flat, 2 wire, "zip" cord type, with molded caps, that are probably 20 guage. A 180 watt load, (2-90 watt "A" bulbs in a table lamp" had the cord "quite warm" to the touch.
Suggested that the homeowner remove them while I was there, as I don't have the authority to "make the removal". He had a "new one, still in the package, made in CHINA, max. 10 amps, and what appears to be a "UL" logo, but alas, no "listing number.
BTW, they were bought at the $1 store.
John


John

#82962 - 12/27/02 08:23 PM Re: Joe --- Please don't yell  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
[Linked Image]

http://www.electrical-safety.com/

[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 12-30-2002).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

#82963 - 12/27/02 11:21 PM Re: Joe --- Please don't yell  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
I tend to agree that items that are plugged in are outside the scope of the NEC, and in my opinion most of Article 422 is outside the scope of the code. This is based on 90.2(A). This section says the NEC covers the "the installation of electric conductors, electric equipment, signaling and communications conductors and equipment, ...". It is my contention that equipment that is plugged in is not installed and therefore outside the scope of the NEC. I believe that there are other NFPA codes that do apply to cords and equipment, but these are not adopted by anywhere near as many jurisdictions as the NEC is.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

#82964 - 12/27/02 11:45 PM Re: Joe --- Please don't yell  
Joe Tedesco  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Boston, Massachusetts USA
[Linked Image]
http://www.electrical-safety.com/

[This message has been edited by Joe Tedesco (edited 12-30-2002).]


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant

Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4

Member Spotlight
sbi
sbi
indiana
Posts: 47
Joined: March 2008
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8202 MB (Peak: 0.9941 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-23 05:35:57 UTC