ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Do we need grounding?
by gfretwell - 04/06/24 08:32 PM
UL 508A SPACING
by tortuga - 03/30/24 07:39 PM
Increasing demand factors in residential
by tortuga - 03/28/24 05:57 PM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
0 members (), 96 guests, and 10 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
#82507 11/19/02 11:10 AM
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 54
M
Member
Article 300-7 of the 1996 code Raceways exposed to different temperatures. Part "b" expansion joints. I rejected the installation because there were no expansion joints in the conduit runs. The enginer replied that article 300-7 does not apply to expansion joints. I do not see how he came up with this conclusion. Can someone enlighten me why part b is under Raceways exposed to different temperatures?

Stay up to Code with the Latest NEC:


>> 2023 NEC & Related Reference & Exam Prep
2023 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides

Pass Your Exam the FIRST TIME with the Latest NEC & Exam Prep

>> 2020 NEC & Related Reference & Study Guides
 

#82508 11/19/02 11:46 AM
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
R
Member
Yes, the section does require expansion joints, but only where necessary to compensate for thermal expansion and contraction. Just because the raceway is exposed to different temperatures does not mean an expansion joint is required. You have to do a calculation based on the range of temperatures and the coefficient of expansion to determine if an expansion joint is necessary.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5