ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
twh 10
Admin 4
Recent Posts
Any UL 508 experts out there?
by jraef. 05/23/17 07:31 PM
Dryer, Range grounding from "Main" panel
by sparkync. 05/23/17 03:32 PM
Heat pump conundrum
by sparkyinak. 05/21/17 08:49 PM
Interesting week
by HotLine1. 05/20/17 11:57 AM
Electrical Pricing Guide
by ElectricianBud. 05/18/17 12:17 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
236,674 Are you busy
171,656 Re: Forum
164,631 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 58 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#81799 - 09/18/02 08:15 PM non met cable protection  
ken m  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 58
south carolina
can anyone reference a 99 or 02 code that requires protection for nm cable in a res garage from outlet box to ceiling? a local inspector believes conduit must be used from device to a location 8' above the floor. in the 99 code (all the locals require) art 300.4 2 d should answer his question. also what about commercial garages not rated for any class protection like art. 514
i hope this question makes some sense.
thx., ken m


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#81800 - 09/18/02 10:46 PM Re: non met cable protection  
harold endean  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
Boonton, NJ
Ken,

If an inspector fails your job, he should quote you chapter and verse from the proper code like the NEC where you are in violation of. In the NEC under sec. 336-6 (b) you need protection from phyiscal damage to at least 6' above finished floor. ( This is from the 1999 NEC) Here in NJ I am still under the 1999 NEC.


#81801 - 09/19/02 07:08 AM Re: non met cable protection  
Redsy  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
Bucks County PA
Harold,

Did you mean 6 inches?

Ken,

thet term' "subject to physical damage" is a matter of opinion. However, I believe that some AHJs use Art. 398.15 (C) as a guide for where phisical protection is required (7').



Member Spotlight
Niko
Niko
Campbell, CA
Posts: 356
Joined: August 2006
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.012s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7511 MB (Peak: 0.8747 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-24 02:15:51 UTC