ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
Video: Inventor of the GFCI self-testing shocks
by Bill Addiss. 01/17/18 09:36 PM
FPE in Germany
by HotLine1. 01/17/18 07:07 PM
VDE 0100 to introduce AFCIs
by LongRunner. 01/17/18 10:32 AM
Fujifilm Recalls Power Adapter Wall Plugs
by Admin. 01/16/18 07:04 PM
Air Compressor feeder conductor sizing
by Potseal. 01/15/18 09:08 PM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
SE cable question
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 16 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Horse piddle #80909
06/10/02 05:07 PM
06/10/02 05:07 PM
R
Rabbit  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 62
Kingsport Tennessee
Am coming out of the main switch gear in a hospital with a 480v 150a feed. The gear is in the basement. This will feed a new 208/120 panel on the 3rd floor via a transformer, also on the 3rd floor. The print shows the feeder going strait to the trans. Don't I need a disconnect here? Panel is main brkr. Also this panel will serve some isolated ground circuits. Does the ig have to go all the way back to the gear or can it stop at the trans? Articals?

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Horse piddle #80910
06/10/02 05:36 PM
06/10/02 05:36 PM
R
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
There is not a code requirement to have a disconnect at the transformer. The transformer primary does require an OCPD, but that can be at the main gear and provide the required protection for both the feeder conductors and the primary side of the transformer. As for your isolated grounds look at 250.146(D). They must trerminate at a point where they can clear any ground fault. For your SDS, that would be at the same point where you connect the grounding electrode conductor for the secondary of the transformer.
Don

[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 06-10-2002).]


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: Horse piddle #80911
06/10/02 07:39 PM
06/10/02 07:39 PM
D
dlabrenz  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25
Muskegon, MI
I would think that a disconnect would be required to protect the secondary conductors.
240-21(c)(1) seems to indicate that the secondary conductors are not protected by the primary OCPD, and I am not sure that I would like unprotected conductors running 3 floor til they get to the mail in the load center.

Re: Horse piddle #80912
06/10/02 08:39 PM
06/10/02 08:39 PM
R
Rabbit  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 62
Kingsport Tennessee
Thanks Don. This is my first hospital and it just didn,t look right. I will proceed.
Dlabrenz, the conductors are protected at the switch gear, approx. 150 ft.

Re: Horse piddle #80913
06/10/02 09:39 PM
06/10/02 09:39 PM
R
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
dlabrenz,
The main in the panel can provide the required protection of the secondary side of the transformer and the secondary conductors. This may involve the use of the "tap" rules that will limit the length of the secondary conductors.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)

Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
SafetyWired
SafetyWired
Pa, USA
Posts: 44
Joined: July 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 22
Admin 20
Potseal 13
Popular Topics(Views)
243,530 Are you busy
180,332 Re: Forum
170,823 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9660 MB (Peak: 1.1054 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-01-18 04:06:52 UTC