Design E motors - in my motor class this was discussed last week...they said this is an example of the code getting ahead of technology...kind of...a few years ago there was talk of developing these super efficient (E) motors...turned out these motors were so expensive to develope no one wanted to buy them....so...no such motors are on the market.
As I recall, the Design E NEMA spec was rescinded. . .about a year ago. I read it in a trade journal (can't find the one right now) and heard it from a State Electrical Inspector who was leading a Code Class, February, last year.
Re: Overcurrent Protection#80184 03/14/0207:22 AM03/14/0207:22 AM
The thing I deal with everyday is the use of IEC starters and the MSP (motor starter protector).
The reason I bring this up, the MSP does not meet UL 489. Which means that it cannot be used as a stand alone SSPD (short circuit protective device.) In Europe, it is recognized as such. It's really confusing.
It can be used in the context of NEC 430-53c which is group motor rating. However, I get at least 10 calls a week on use of this within a motor control circuit.
I came to the realization, that the cost of these devices ($19.00 - $120.00) makes them such a commodity...that I will be seeing more and more of them in place of NEMA devices.
It's not a bad thing, if used correctly.
Carl Lee Tolbert Technical Support AC Drives Automationdirect.com Your source for the most practical automation products at almost-free pricing, delivered by 11 a.m., just by clicking a mouse. PH: (770)844-4200 Fax:(770)886-3199 www.automationdirect.com