ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
600 KW 120/208 3 Phase Y protection
by Yooperup. 07/21/17 09:27 AM
1913 American Electrician's Handbook
by gfretwell. 07/20/17 01:08 PM
Green House wiring
by ghost307. 07/20/17 09:10 AM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 07/18/17 08:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
239,193 Are you busy
174,586 Re: Forum
167,018 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 34 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#80025 - 02/14/02 08:31 PM 1996/1999/2002 Code?  
CTwireman  Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 840
Connecticut, USA
What edition of the Code is your locality currently using? Does your state have any interesting ammendments? I know how stringent the Code is in Massachusetts.

I read on other posts that California is still using the 1996 Code. Why are they so far behind? (Anyone from CA want to answer this?)

Ill start this one: RI and CT are using the 1999 Code, and the 2002 probably wont get adopted for another year at least.

[This message has been edited by CTwireman (edited 02-14-2002).]


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#80026 - 02/14/02 08:54 PM Re: 1996/1999/2002 Code?  
MVillines  Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 21
Ky adopted 2002 Jan 3 including 210.12

#80027 - 02/15/02 12:51 AM Re: 1996/1999/2002 Code?  
Elzappr  Offline
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 270
Oregon is using '99. Won't complete amendments to 2002 'til next spring.

#80028 - 02/15/02 01:47 AM Re: 1996/1999/2002 Code?  
dlabrenz  Offline
Joined: Sep 2001
Posts: 25
Muskegon, MI
Michigan is using the the 1999 minus 210-12
Michigan has also amended the code in a number of places such as Art 336. Non metallic sheathed cable is permitted in buildings over 3 stories in height.
I do not expect Michigan to adopt the 2002 much before January of 2003

#80029 - 02/15/02 01:40 PM Re: 1996/1999/2002 Code?  
dana1028  Offline
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 163
San Carlos, CA
re: 1996

I believe this is the correct answer or pretty close to it ...CA 'bundles' it's codes (plumbing, mechanical, bldg. and elect) and have been using the 'Uniform' codes (1 yr. out of sync with NEC...'U' codes are '97, 2000) takes about 1 yr. of political wrangling to adopt the code (another yr. out of sync) the '99 would not normally go into affect until 2001 anyway....however there has been a big fight going on in the west between the 'I' codes (International) and the 'U' codes....there is a LOT of money donated every yr. to the state politicians by the 'U' people (read unions) there is a strong vested interest to keep the 'U' this intense 'I' code, 'U' code wrangling has delayed the adoption of any code since the 1997 'U' codes...thus no update on the NEC. [Linked Image]

#80030 - 02/15/02 01:55 PM Re: 1996/1999/2002 Code?  
CTwireman  Offline
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 840
Connecticut, USA
Ahhhh....I see. Sounds like a bunch of political mumbo jumbo going on.

The reason I was curious about California is because my friends have a new house (built in '98) and their bathrooms are on one 15 amp circuit (with the GFI in the garage!) and there are no grounds on any of the switches. In fact, they didnt start putting dedicated 20 amp circuits in the bathrooms until late 2000.


#80031 - 02/16/02 12:56 AM Re: 1996/1999/2002 Code?  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,878

Last I heard NY is still oficially on the 1996 NEC. I don't know of any Amendments offhand. The inspectors will be looking for AFCIs though, but as per the '99 it seems.


Member Spotlight
Blue Collar Country
Posts: 5,316
Joined: January 2005
Show All Member Profiles 

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7842 MB (Peak: 0.9353 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-07-22 02:33:28 UTC