ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
600 KW 120/208 3 Phase Y protection
by Yooperup. 07/21/17 09:27 AM
1913 American Electrician's Handbook
by gfretwell. 07/20/17 01:08 PM
Green House wiring
by ghost307. 07/20/17 09:10 AM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 07/18/17 08:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
239,182 Are you busy
174,577 Re: Forum
167,015 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (gfretwell), 37 guests, and 11 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#79199 - 12/03/01 04:49 PM 300-5d  
Scott Yeazell  Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 4
Springfield, OH, USA
Do underground service entrance conductors installed by directional boring method rather than trenching require a warning ribbon?


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#79200 - 12/03/01 05:06 PM Re: 300-5d  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Yes. There were proposals made to provide such an exemption, but they were rejected. The chances of damage from future excavation do not change just because you used a closed rather than open excavation method for the installation. If you want to bore you will have to do it twice, one for the cable and one for the ribbon.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)

#79201 - 12/04/01 09:12 PM Re: 300-5d  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
As the result of a follow up question to me from Scott on this subject via e-mail I did some additional research. My original post is not entirely correct.
A proposal was submitted to the NFPA for a change in 300-5(d) for the 2002 code. This was proposal 3-43. The proposal asked that the following wording be added to 300-5(d): "Horizontally bored service laterals shall be exempt from this requirement." Code Making Panel 3 rejected the proposal with the statement that; "Present language only addresses trenching, not boring, thus boring is already excluded from the ribbon requirement".
This indicates to me that the panel did not intend to require a ribbon above cables that were installed by boring. It aprears to me, that based on the panel comment, if you are operating under the 99 code, a ribbon would not be required for conductors installed by boring. Also note the new wording applies to all underground service conductors, not just service laterals as in the 99 code.
Don(resqcapt19)

[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 12-05-2001).]


Don(resqcapt19)

#79202 - 12/06/01 09:14 PM Re: 300-5d  
Nick  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 599
Riverside, CA
Quote
The chances of damage from future excavation do not change just because you used a closed rather than open excavation method for the installation.

I agree with this statement more than the panels findings.



Member Spotlight
mxslick
mxslick
Atomic City, ID USA
Posts: 803
Joined: October 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.010s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7599 MB (Peak: 0.8920 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-07-21 18:40:49 UTC