ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by sparky. 04/28/17 08:11 PM
Electrode boilers question
by annemarie1. 04/27/17 01:40 PM
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,898 Are you busy
169,704 Re: Forum
162,928 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 60 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#76743 - 03/19/01 06:47 PM Flexible metal and Liquidtight Flexible Metal Conduit Max Lengths for Flexibility  
Steve Saylors  Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 1
Portland, Oregon, USA
NEC Art. 350 & 351 allows these wiring methods to be unsupported in lengths up to 3 feet at terminals where flexibility is required (such as at motors). Article 300-22(b) permits these wiring methods in lengths up to 4 feet to connect "physically adjustable equipment and devices in ducts and plenums". Does the location specific 300-22 (such as a fan motor in an air handler's casing) supercede the general requirements of 350/351 and allow UNSUPPORTED 4 foot lengths in this application?


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#76744 - 03/21/01 08:21 PM Re: Flexible metal and Liquidtight Flexible Metal Conduit Max Lengths for Flexibility  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,878
NY, USA
Steve,

I was hoping that someone familiar with those code sections would reply. If it was my job I would provide a support so that the unsupported part is no longer than 3 feet. That, to me, would seem to satisfy everything. It seems to me that the 4 ft length mentioned is the total length allowed under those circumstances period. And since support (or lack of it) is not mentioned I would say that the provisions of 350/351 would apply and that 3 ft maximum unsupported length would be the rule.

Under 300-1(a) it says "This article covers wiring methods for all wiring installations unless modified by other articles"
I would say that 350/351 has the last word.

Any other opinions on this?

Bill



Member Spotlight
waymag
waymag
dallas, texas, USA
Posts: 67
Joined: January 2002
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.009s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7442 MB (Peak: 0.8649 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-29 01:47:43 UTC