ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
600 KW 120/208 3 Phase Y protection
by Yooperup. 07/24/17 12:20 PM
1913 American Electrician's Handbook
by gfretwell. 07/20/17 01:08 PM
Green House wiring
by ghost307. 07/20/17 09:10 AM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 07/18/17 08:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
239,318 Are you busy
174,785 Re: Forum
167,155 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (NORCAL), 78 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#76687 - 03/14/01 10:54 PM Too Many Breakers?  
WireStu  Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4
Farmingdale, NY 11735
We came across the following installation:

A 75 kVA 480-120/208Y step down transformer protected on the 480V primary side by a 100A fused disconnect switch feeds two 120/208 panelboards. These are two 42 circuit 225 Amp Main Breaker panels loaded to the gills (and contain mini breakers also) from the secondary of the transformer. The low voltage side current rating of the transformer is 203 Amps. As I interpet the code, with the 100 Amp fused disconnect switch on the primary, secondary protection on the transformer is not required.

There is probably not 450 Amps of connected load on the panels, but could someone please refernce what code sections either allow or disallow this installation.

Thanks in advance


2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#76688 - 03/15/01 11:19 AM Re: Too Many Breakers?  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
WireStu,
You are correct that the transformer itself does not require overcurrent protection on the secondary side, however the conductors feeding the panels may require overcurrent protection. See 240-21(c)(2).
Also this installation would be in violation of 384-15 if all 42 spaces are filled and some of the spaces have 1/2 space breakers in them.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)

#76689 - 03/15/01 03:50 PM Re: Too Many Breakers?  
Glenn  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
Don,

Doesn't 340-3(f) require secondary OC if it is a 4W system [ 208/120V ]?

Glenn


#76690 - 03/15/01 04:15 PM Re: Too Many Breakers?  
WireStu  Offline
Junior Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 4
Farmingdale, NY 11735
Thanks for the responses. A question I still have is although the transformer puts out 208 amps, can 450 amps worth of potential load be connected to it?

Thanks in advance

Stu


#76691 - 03/15/01 05:33 PM Re: Too Many Breakers?  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Glenn,
Yes, 240-3(f) requires CONDUCTOR overcurrent protection for 3 phase 4 wire systems, but you go to 240-21(c) to find out how to protect these conductors. There is no requirement to protect the trasformer secondary if the primary OCPD is rated at 125% or less of the primary current. The transformer overcurrent protection requirements are all in 450-3.

Stu,
The 100 amp OCPD on the primary will protect the transformer from the 450 amp connected load. A load calculation need to be done to see what the actual load is. The transformer may be too small.

Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)

#76692 - 03/15/01 07:35 PM Re: Too Many Breakers?  
Glenn  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
Don,

Poor choice of wording in my previopus reply.

I should have said:

Doesn't 240-3(f) require secondary conductor OC protection if it is a 4W system [ 208/120V ].

And added "240-21(c)".

Glenn



Member Spotlight
electure
electure
Fullerton, CA USA
Posts: 4,260
Joined: December 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.011s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7761 MB (Peak: 0.9206 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-07-25 06:34:13 UTC