ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
AreMetal Ladders Ever OK For Electrical Work?
by HotLine1. 01/22/18 07:31 PM
Photocell
by twh. 01/22/18 05:06 PM
VDE 0100 to introduce AFCIs
by sparky. 01/20/18 05:09 PM
MRI LED lights dimmer control replacement - wow!
by Potseal. 01/19/18 08:52 PM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
SE cable question
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 11 guests, and 7 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
CODE VIOLATION OR NOT #76458
02/08/01 10:46 AM
02/08/01 10:46 AM
D
doc  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 123
Texas
In this plant we have 3 complete different services coming into it,I'm talking meters and all.The building has walls breaking it into sections,
can we run power out of service 1 into a room and then come from service 2 or 3 into same room . I don't think they should be mixedor if they can what are the guide lines for mixing.
the service is 220 3 phase and 440 3 phase .
The voltages running into same rooms from different sources or 110 up to 440 single and 3 phase


MAY THE SUN SHINE ON YOUR FACE IN THE MORNING AND YOU AWAKE WITH A SMILE
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: CODE VIOLATION OR NOT #76459
02/08/01 11:17 AM
02/08/01 11:17 AM
R
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Doc,
I don't see a violation of the NEC other than a probable violation of 230-2(e). There also may be OSHA issues as far as the required lockout/tagout procedures.
Don(resqcapt19)


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: CODE VIOLATION OR NOT #76460
02/08/01 04:39 PM
02/08/01 04:39 PM
S
sam  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 29
should each service have a permenant tag stating building serviced by the number of services to the building (on each service) that way fire department has a way of knowing to.

[This message has been edited by sam (edited 02-08-2001).]

Re: CODE VIOLATION OR NOT #76461
02/08/01 05:52 PM
02/08/01 05:52 PM
S
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,344
230-2-e (identification)kicks you over to 225-37( more identification)which tells you to mark everything.

Then we come to Ex #1 which basically says that you can blow that off if you maintain "safe switching procedures"
( exceptions can be so conflicting!)

This is probably what Don stated.... [Linked Image]

Once in a while i'll go on a service call where everything is identified. I'm sure it takes some time, but it sure saves some too... [Linked Image]

As i read it,without hashin' 230 too hard, you could have six meters and mains, .

I wonder if some places are purposley set up this way to avoid larger more expensive services, or to introduce a variety of voltages without having to pitch for an X-former
[Linked Image]

Re: CODE VIOLATION OR NOT #76462
02/09/01 01:31 PM
02/09/01 01:31 PM
D
doc  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 123
Texas
maybe I was misinformed,but in a similar plant we had to different services coming in and they ran power all over the plant .The company wanted to add a large sub panel so we called in a large contrating company {electrical } and they told us we could not mix the services up and he was paid a gob of money to run new circuits and keep them in same room.When he was finished room 1,2,3
was from service #1 and room 4,5 were on service # 2. This where I am confused as what you guys are saying is maybe the old company I worked for may have been taken if there is nothing wrong with mixing


MAY THE SUN SHINE ON YOUR FACE IN THE MORNING AND YOU AWAKE WITH A SMILE
Re: CODE VIOLATION OR NOT #76463
02/09/01 07:51 PM
02/09/01 07:51 PM
S
sparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,344
Was it done simply to restore some sense of order?

Re: CODE VIOLATION OR NOT #76464
02/15/01 01:14 PM
02/15/01 01:14 PM
D
doc  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 123
Texas
According to the electrical contractor,it was a serious violation to mix services,and therefore to get up to code we had to pull circuits out of an area that was provided by say service one and run circuits from service 2 into the location that service 1 had been powering that way all power in that room was from one service and disconnects are all in same area


MAY THE SUN SHINE ON YOUR FACE IN THE MORNING AND YOU AWAKE WITH A SMILE
Re: CODE VIOLATION OR NOT #76465
02/15/01 04:22 PM
02/15/01 04:22 PM
G
Glenn  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 75
I am not aware on any rules in NEC 230 dis-allowing the inter-mixing of the conductors in a raceway after they left an OC device.
It does seem that it should considered as an separated devired, somewhere in 230-2, and would require a transfer switch in case some of the conductors inter-connected and thus a possible 'back-feed' into a service that is down for repairs etc.
Who knows when an insulation break-down may happen between the one or more services?

It may not be a violation, but could be a saftey issue.

Glenn


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
lil suzi
lil suzi
Midwest
Posts: 57
Joined: August 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 21
sparky 15
Potseal 15
Popular Topics(Views)
243,596 Are you busy
180,394 Re: Forum
170,865 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.9919 MB (Peak: 1.1538 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-01-23 02:23:49 UTC