ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
600 KW 120/208 3 Phase Y protection
by Yooperup. 07/21/17 09:27 AM
1913 American Electrician's Handbook
by gfretwell. 07/20/17 01:08 PM
Green House wiring
by ghost307. 07/20/17 09:10 AM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 07/18/17 08:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
239,222 Are you busy
174,619 Re: Forum
167,046 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 56 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#75983 - 03/23/07 04:23 PM Allowable voltage drop in DC Circuits  
NJ_WVUGrad  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 47
Neptune, NJ, USA
I am working under the assumption that DC circuits fall under the maximum 3% allowable voltage drop as stipulated by the NEC.


Is this correct?

It is for DC feeds to radio equipment located on the roof of a building being fed from rectifers in the basement.


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#75984 - 03/23/07 04:50 PM Re: Allowable voltage drop in DC Circuits  
SteveFehr  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,207
Chesapeake, VA
NEC never actually requires 3%, just recommends it. I'd put this into the category of "it's always a good idea to oversize for voltage drop" though!

What's the acceptable DC voltage range of the equipment? If it can handle the drop, it's not a big deal.


#75985 - 03/23/07 04:54 PM Re: Allowable voltage drop in DC Circuits  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
I agree with Steve, great idea to maintain less than 3% but not NEC required.


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#75986 - 03/23/07 07:54 PM Re: Allowable voltage drop in DC Circuits  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,853
Brick, NJ USA
NJ:
This was a class 'discussion' item last nite.

Vd is a fpn (Fine Print Note), not 'Code' not mandatory.

Vd is a design issue, and could/may be debated via 110.3 (B)

'Good Practice' & 'Common Sense' are not in the NEC, but should be observed by all.

I would check the equipment for a voltage, and take a reading under load, if it's already installed. Or, I would do the calcs on paper beforehand, and 'lean' to a larger conductor.

John


John

#75987 - 03/23/07 09:40 PM Re: Allowable voltage drop in DC Circuits  
NJ_WVUGrad  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 47
Neptune, NJ, USA
Thanks for the input,

Now that everyone mentions it I remember this coming up in past.

The equipment runs 48vdc and the equip manufacturer states that the equip is fully operational down to 36vdc and they often crank up the output on the DC rectifiers to compensate.

I will just have to come up with allowable voltage drop calcs for these designs based on that criteria.

Thanks for the help


#160785 - 03/25/07 08:36 PM Re: Allowable voltage drop in DC Circuits [Re: NJ_WVUGrad]  
NJ_WVUGrad  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 47
Neptune, NJ, USA
Just curious about others opinions,

Designing engineer for the clients wants us (the consulting engineers) to spec out pulling a Cat5e cable in the same 2" conduit with (6) #2AWG DC cables for the radio equipment.

This cable is simply an alarm cable that will tell them if the door on the Equipment cabinet is open or closed.

The cable pulls will be in the range of 200-400'.

Anyone have any tips for getting the Cat5 pulled in with the #2's without tearing it up



#160791 - 03/25/07 09:09 PM Re: Allowable voltage drop in DC Circuits [Re: NJ_WVUGrad]  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,099
Estero,Fl,usa
Back in the olden days when we were pulling fiber with other fat conductors in ducts we pulled it in innerduct, a smurf tube like deal. That may not be an option in 2" tho. You need to do a fill calc.


Greg Fretwell

#160807 - 03/26/07 06:38 AM Re: Allowable voltage drop in DC Circuits [Re: gfretwell]  
SteveFehr  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,207
Chesapeake, VA
I see smurf tube all the time to protect the fiber optic cabling, but yeah, not an option. Mil-spec cat5 has a stronger jacket and would easily hold up, but it's expensive.

Why not just pull the cat5e in last?


#160810 - 03/26/07 07:16 AM Re: Allowable voltage drop in DC Circuits [Re: SteveFehr]  
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
If you have a couple of 90s, the Cat 5 is likely to be damaged or broken. We won't even install #14 control wires in with power wires larger than #4. This happens where there is a 90 near the end of the run. Some of the conductors will take the short path on the inside of the 90 and others will have to be a bit longer riding on the outside of the inner conductors. This extra length has to come from the feed end and if the Cat 5 is on the outside and if it can't slide by the other conductors it will stretch or break.
Don

Last edited by resqcapt19; 03/26/07 07:16 AM.


Member Spotlight
dougwells
dougwells
kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 1,138
Joined: May 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.019s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8020 MB (Peak: 0.9727 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-07-23 02:37:01 UTC