ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
ShoutChat
Recent Posts
Increasing demand factors in residential
by gfretwell - 03/28/24 12:43 AM
Portable generator question
by Steve Miller - 03/19/24 08:50 PM
Do we need grounding?
by NORCAL - 03/19/24 05:11 PM
240V only in a home and NEC?
by dsk - 03/19/24 06:33 AM
Cordless Tools: The Obvious Question
by renosteinke - 03/14/24 08:05 PM
New in the Gallery:
This is a new one
This is a new one
by timmp, September 24
Few pics I found
Few pics I found
by timmp, August 15
Who's Online Now
2 members (ampherder, Scott35), 259 guests, and 18 robots.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#6264 12/27/01 11:40 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
I followed up on a home inspection report today and opened up a residential 150 Amp 30 ckt panel which contained mostly mini breakers for a total of 34 branch circuits with about 8 full size spaces still open. It was not a "CTL" panel. The home inspection report noted that there was "additional capacity available". The bus diagram on the door only depicted full size breakers (one per space = 30).

Comments, please.

#6265 12/28/01 08:20 AM
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,294
Member
You might check on the label for the "approved" C/Bs to be used with the loadcenter to see if it allows for the use of the minis (AKA junks).
If not, it's subpanel time.
???Is a CTL required where the available fault current is low (<10KA)? (I don't know the answer to this one)

#6266 12/28/01 09:56 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 599
J
JBD Offline
Member
In this case CTL means CircuiT Limiting not current limiting. This is a UL Classification for limiting the number of circuits in a panelboard.

Circuit limiting "tandem" breakers have some type of rejection feature to prevent them being installed in non-CTL panels. "Cheater" breakers do not have these rejectors.

#6267 12/28/01 04:40 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
Redsy,
was this concern part of your follow up? can you simply take advantage of the 8 open spaces??

#6268 12/28/01 10:22 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
sparky,

I'm mainly just curious about the use of mini breakers in a non-CTL panel and how many breakers can properly be installed. I'm thinking only 30 full size(no minis). Someone could conceivably install 60 mini breakers in this panel.
The reason that I was called in was because the home inspector "recommended the service be upgraded to 200 amp". What his recommendation is based on, I haven't a clue. He didn't say. Now the buyers want a 200 amp upgrade. This was immediately after his remark that "there was additional capadity available". This, I assume was due to the 8 available spaces. I did a calculation for existing dwellings and determined that about 115 amps is adequate for this size home.

#6269 12/29/01 06:39 AM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
I see..I am also curious,
Is 'CTL' clearly defined on the panel stickers? Or is this info purseued via listing?

#6270 12/29/01 10:19 AM
Joined: Jul 2001
Posts: 311
F
Member
Redsy,

I never heard of an Inspector requiring a service upgrade without having calculations from NEC Article 220 that would justify such. Calculations from Article 220 would clearly indicate if one was needed.

#6271 12/29/01 05:51 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,749
Member
Sparky: Class CTL means "circuit limiting" See Section 384-15, paragraph 2 in the 1999 NEC:

A lighting and appliance branch-circuit panelboard shall be provided with physical means to prevent the installation of more overcurrent devices than that number for which the panelboard was designed, rated, and approved.

From the UL White Book: "Class CTL panelboards are identified by the words "Class CTL" on the Underwriters Laboratories Inc. Follow-Up Service Listing Mark.

Class CTL panelboards incorporate physical features which in conjunction with the physical size, configuration, or other
means provided in Class CTL circuit breakers, fuse holders, or fusible switches, are designed to prevent the installation of
more overcurrent protective poles than that number for which the device is designed and rated."

I have images showing this information on the equipment.


Joe Tedesco, NEC Consultant
#6272 12/29/01 08:13 PM
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 5,392
S
Member
Yes Joe,
my Q was if the panels are, or are required to be, marked as such.

#6273 12/29/01 09:26 PM
Joined: Mar 2001
Posts: 2,056
R
Redsy Offline OP
Member
Frank,

He's not a real electrical inspector. He's one of the "Home Inspection Service" employees. This is a popular concept in recent years in which a home buyer will pay about $300.00 to have someone give a home that they want to buy the once-over. It is just a cursory inspection of the major parts of the home. Often, they recommend a professional tradesman evaluate certain systems furhter. As I said, his "recommended upgrade" seems to be just a thought on his part because he didn't have any basis for it. Problem is, now the buyers are requesting the upgrade. The "existing dwelling" calculation falls well within the existing 150 amp service, so I can honestly say it doesn't need an upgrade. I don't like all these mini breakers in this panel. (He didn't seem to mind them). However, I was called to asses the service capacity only, not the inside of the panel. It's an awkward situation, I wish I hadn't seen the panel.

Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Link Copied to Clipboard
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.7.5