ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
MRI LED lights dimmer control replacement - wow!
by Potseal. 01/19/18 08:52 PM
VDE 0100 to introduce AFCIs
by sparky. 01/19/18 08:03 PM
Video: Inventor of the GFCI self-testing shocks
by Bill Addiss. 01/17/18 11:11 PM
FPE in Germany
by HotLine1. 01/17/18 07:07 PM
Fujifilm Recalls Power Adapter Wall Plugs
by Admin. 01/16/18 07:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
SE cable question
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 14 guests, and 12 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Is this a Feeder? #55544
09/01/05 12:12 PM
09/01/05 12:12 PM
G
GovtVoltage  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 20
Sudbury,MA
Is the Conductors for a Sub-Panel considered a Feeder and are we subsequently able to use Table 310.15(B)(6) to calculate our wire size?

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: Is this a Feeder? #55545
09/01/05 01:50 PM
09/01/05 01:50 PM
G
gfretwell  Online Content

Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,166
Estero,Fl,usa
You can only use 310.15(B)(6) if this is the feeder to the entire dwelling load, like the feeder from an outside main disconnect to the main panel inside the house. A sub panel off the main is sized with 310.16.
It has to do with load diversity.


Greg Fretwell
Re: Is this a Feeder? #55546
09/01/05 04:59 PM
09/01/05 04:59 PM
Tom  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2001
Posts: 1,044
Shinnston, WV USA
Table 310.15(B)(6) is one of the areas of the code that can cause a fistfight to break out. While I am in complete agreement with the post from Gfretwell, there are many parts of the country where this is not enforced this way and you would be able to use the table for your feeder. If your work is subject to inspection, it is best (as always) to consult with the AHJ prior to commencing work.

Tom


Few things are harder to put up with than the annoyance of a good example.
Re: Is this a Feeder? #55547
09/01/05 05:21 PM
09/01/05 05:21 PM
R
Roger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
N.C.
I agree with Greg and Tom, 310.16

Roger

Re: Is this a Feeder? #55548
09/01/05 07:36 PM
09/01/05 07:36 PM
G
GovtVoltage  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 20
Sudbury,MA
Thanks for the reply guys......

Re: Is this a Feeder? #55549
09/03/05 05:53 AM
09/03/05 05:53 AM
I
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
And I say do away with Table 310.15(B)(6) to make the NEC smaller and with less sections of confusion. [Linked Image]

Is using 310.16 that outrageously expensive?

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: Is this a Feeder? #55550
09/03/05 08:54 AM
09/03/05 08:54 AM
W
winnie  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 649
boston, ma
Given what copper prices are doing, every little bit helps.

On the other hand, reduced resistance in feeders means more efficient deliver of power to the load, and lower lifetime costs. If you take the 'Copper Development Association' at their word, you'd be upsizing from 310.16 by a size or two anyway. [Linked Image]

On the left foot, I'd rather do away with 310.15, and instead change the calculations for service size to give a _separate_ result for conductor ampacity and required OCPD, in much the same way that oversized OCPD can be used with a given conductor ampacity for specific loads such as motors or welders.

-Jon


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
BEAMEUP
BEAMEUP
WA
Posts: 27
Joined: December 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 20
sparky 16
Potseal 15
Popular Topics(Views)
243,560 Are you busy
180,361 Re: Forum
170,838 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 14 (0.004s) Memory: 0.9831 MB (Peak: 1.1346 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-01-20 08:41:19 UTC