ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
201 volt equipment?
by bigpapa. 04/29/17 12:15 AM
Schneider LC1D09
by jraef. 04/28/17 11:05 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by sparky. 04/28/17 08:11 PM
Electrode boilers question
by annemarie1. 04/27/17 01:40 PM
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,920 Are you busy
169,728 Re: Forum
162,946 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 47 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#51498 - 04/30/05 10:10 PM Bonding fire sprinkler pipe  
dmattox  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 265
Anaheim, CA
I've never bonded sprinkler pipes, never been shown on the plans nor has an inspector required it or asked about it. However, it seems to me that it should be by 250.104. Am I correct in thinking that the sprinker pipe should be bonded?


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#51499 - 04/30/05 10:39 PM Re: Bonding fire sprinkler pipe  
Ryan_J  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,374
West Jordan, Utah, USA
If it is likely to become energized, it would be required by 250.104(B).

I could see that a person could argue that this falls under 250.104(A), but I personally disagree.

[This message has been edited by Ryan_J (edited 04-30-2005).]


Ryan Jackson,
Salt Lake City

#51500 - 05/01/05 12:48 AM Re: Bonding fire sprinkler pipe  
Larry Fine  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
Richmond, VA
I agree with Ryan, although (A) doesn't specifically say "domestic water piping system" and it does say "metal water piping system(s)".

I also like:
"The equipment grounding conductor for the circuit that may energize the piping shall be permitted to serve as the bonding means."


Larry Fine
Fine Electric Co.
fineelectricco.com

#51501 - 05/01/05 02:37 AM Re: Bonding fire sprinkler pipe  
Trumpy  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,211
SI,New Zealand
One thing that I would be thinking of, is where a difference in potential could cause a shock hazard.
One thing from the NZ Electrical Regs:
Quote
If a metallic part could become energised, it shall be bonded to Earth.

I think personally, that unless you can give real Segregation, between systems, they should be Bonded together.
Just my $0.02 worth. [Linked Image]


Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

#51502 - 05/01/05 02:55 AM Re: Bonding fire sprinkler pipe  
e57  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
S.F.,CA USA
Where I'm at most sprinkler system piping originates from over-sized domestic water feeds, which are part of the electrode system, so in that way are bonded. I have had to bond dry stand pipes though. And un-like some other areas, (Which I have discovered here on ECN) hot water and gas well at the origin of each source. I'm waiting for the day I have to bond the sewer too.


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason

#51503 - 05/01/05 07:59 AM Re: Bonding fire sprinkler pipe  
harold endean  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 2,233
Boonton, NJ
Just my 2 cents, but if I see a domestic water pipe entering a building and a fire pipe, I guess that they are bonded together somewhere outside, but I am not sure that they are. So to make a positive bond, I would bond the 2 pipe sytems together again inside of the building where you can see it. Who knows maybe the domestic water could get turned off at the street and/or the connection of the 2 pipe sytems outside of the building might fail.


#51504 - 05/01/05 08:27 AM Re: Bonding fire sprinkler pipe  
dmattox  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 265
Anaheim, CA
The projects I work on usually have hundreds of feet of piping for the sprinklers until they get to the source (running to the PIVs then to the DC). The cold water seems to always be ran in PVC until close to the building. Even if the cold water was ran in copper it would probably be a 500-1000' loop between the two (I am not even sure if they are served by the same source). But would that distance be considered properly bonded?


#51505 - 05/01/05 08:47 PM Re: Bonding fire sprinkler pipe  
nesparky  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2001
Posts: 642
omaha,ne
Around here the PIV for the sprinkler is just after where the main water service to the prorerty splits into the sprinkler water feed and the domestic water service. We also have a plumping copper ordinance for both services. PIV typically are near a property line so distanc varies from 10 to 200 feet from the building exterior. Because of the above, bonding of the sprinkler pipes is not needed. Since anyone working with the water service has to get inspections by both the water utility and the plumbing inspectors, we do not worry very much about some clown converting the water service to plastic. Have seen the water utility shut off the water for a couple of people who tried. Water stayed shut off untill licensed plumber fixed it.


ed


Member Spotlight
Bill Addiss
Bill Addiss
NY, USA
Posts: 3,878
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.018s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7940 MB (Peak: 0.9533 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-29 07:30:14 UTC