ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
Electrode boilers question
by SteveFehr. 04/21/17 08:32 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,683 Are you busy
169,407 Re: Forum
162,726 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (gfretwell), 95 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#31408 - 11/22/03 09:55 AM Wow, What's Next?  
rowdyrudy  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 169
Mascoutah, IL USA
Forwarded from an attorney friend in AL. (Shortened from 8 page ruling).
A county judge has ruled that as the county disclaims all responsibility for erroneous rulings incurred during the inspection process, then the county buildings dept. cannot invoke any penalties for presumed violations. It seems the judge is saying it must be a level playing field where the inspectors are liable for capricious rulings if the contractor is subject to sanctions. Looks as if AL is ahead of the pack in declaring that inspectors are held liable for their interpretations of codes and ordinances.
Rowdy


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#31409 - 11/22/03 11:14 AM Re: Wow, What's Next?  
electure  Offline


Member
Joined: Dec 2000
Posts: 4,259
Fullerton, CA USA
This sounds very strange!
As an employee of an electrical contractor, I'm not the one that gets sued if I make a mistake that causes a disaster.
The corporation I work for gets sued.
All they can do is fire me.
The default setting for any public entity is to deny all claims, but now they've got a judge backing this up?
(It looks like inspection wouldn't be such a great idea for my old age job after all?)


#31410 - 11/22/03 11:40 AM Re: Wow, What's Next?  
walrus  Offline
Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 680
Bangor Me. USA
electure

You can be sued but they are looking for deep pockets.

[This message has been edited by walrus (edited 11-22-2003).]


#31411 - 11/22/03 11:55 AM Re: Wow, What's Next?  
Bill Addiss  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,878
NY, USA
Rowdy,

On Long Island our inspections are done by private agencies that have been accepted by the jurisdictions to do inspections. I believe they put up a big bond and the Agency could be held liable if it came down to it.

I think New Jersey and Penn. may have similar situations.

Bill


#31412 - 11/22/03 11:56 AM Re: Wow, What's Next?  
rowdyrudy  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 169
Mascoutah, IL USA
Just got off the phone with J. It appears that the judge said that since the county couldn't be sued for errors by inspectors, then the contractor could not be fined for errors.
Good Judge.
Rowdy


#31413 - 11/22/03 02:23 PM Re: Wow, What's Next?  
maintenanceguy  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 300
Southern NJ, USA
Good ruling...won't survive appeal.


#31414 - 11/22/03 03:38 PM Re: Wow, What's Next?  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
Quote
It appears that the judge said that since the county couldn't be sued for errors by inspectors, then the contractor could not be fined for errors.
Good Judge.

Sounds fair to me! [Linked Image]



Member Spotlight
BEAMEUP
BEAMEUP
WA
Posts: 27
Joined: December 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7842 MB (Peak: 0.9359 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-25 16:22:36 UTC