ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
Fujifilm Recalls Power Adapter Wall Plugs
by Admin. 01/16/18 07:04 PM
VDE 0100 to introduce AFCIs
by sparky. 01/16/18 06:36 PM
Air Compressor feeder conductor sizing
by Potseal. 01/15/18 09:08 PM
Under carpet cable?
by HotLine1. 01/15/18 09:57 AM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
SE cable question
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 19 guests, and 7 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
public record #27107
07/01/03 11:38 PM
07/01/03 11:38 PM
G
ga.sparky56  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
young harris georgia usa
In light of the recent court decision in Texas,what impact will this have on the NEC?

Will we see each state putting it's own stamp on a version of the NEC,and further add to the questions of who allows what and where?

Will we even have a true NEC for the basis?

Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades
Re: public record #27108
07/02/03 05:40 AM
07/02/03 05:40 AM
P
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
Russell,

What exactly was the Tx court case?

Re: public record #27109
07/02/03 07:54 AM
07/02/03 07:54 AM
R
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Paul,
The 5th Circuit of the US Court of Appeals has ruled that if a "model" code is adopted as law, then it can be freely published online without infringing the copyright laws. Here is the court's opinion . Note that this ruling only applies to the 5th circuit, which covers the states of Texas, Mississippi, and Louisiana. Courts in other areas may cite this case, but the ruling in the 5th circuit, does not automatically prevent copyright infringement law suits against those who publish copyrighted codes online in areas outside of the 5th Circuit. The ruling was appealed to the US Supreme Court, but they declined to review the case.
Don

[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 07-02-2003).]

[This message has been edited by resqcapt19 (edited 07-17-2003).]


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: public record #27110
07/02/03 07:57 AM
07/02/03 07:57 AM
R
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
In my opinion, most code users will still purchase the code books. Few could work with only an online copy. The ruling does not say that the code books must be free. If fewer copies of the book are actually sold, the cost may have to go up so that the sponsoring organization can recover their costs.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Re: public record #27111
07/02/03 04:58 PM
07/02/03 04:58 PM
G
ga.sparky56  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
young harris georgia usa
I know I'm a bit simple-minded,but wouldn't it be easier for all concerned to make the Nec exactly what it says and have 1 code nationwide?

Russell

Re: public record #27112
07/02/03 05:38 PM
07/02/03 05:38 PM
R
Roger  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 1,716
N.C.
Hey Russell, I question your simple-mindedness, but the word "simple" does come to play. Your idea would never work because it would be "simple" and practical. [Linked Image]

Roger

Re: public record #27113
07/02/03 05:54 PM
07/02/03 05:54 PM
HotLine1  Offline

Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,916
Brick, NJ USA
Russell:
WE have the NEC available at most of our libraries here in NJ. Also, the town that I work in PT as an AHJ has a copy of the NEC, and Handbook available at the Construction Office Permit counter. Most of the other towns will provide a NEC, IF someone asks for it. (Not to "take" but to read as reference)

Occasionally, I have given homeowners "copies" of outlet spacing requirements, and EC's copies of emergency lighting references. I may be "violating" the copyright law, then again I may not be.

BTW:
NJ "adopts" the NEC (with amendments) as the Electrical Sub-Code for the State Uniform Construction Code. THe State does not "re-print" the NEC into it's UCC books. THe UCC Blue Book is available at ALL town Construction Offices, but I do not believe the general public can buy it. (That may be wrong) It is very boring reading, as it is a "legal document" (Law) and mostly written in "legaliese".
John

[This message has been edited by HotLine1 (edited 07-02-2003).]


John
Re: public record #27114
07/02/03 06:07 PM
07/02/03 06:07 PM
G
ga.sparky56  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 558
young harris georgia usa
One potential problem I could see with the Nec free online,is that homeowners will download it and start argueing code issues,whether they know what they're reading or not.

Can anyone else see this or am I being paranoid?


Russell

Re: public record #27115
07/02/03 06:50 PM
07/02/03 06:50 PM
T
ThinkGood  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Milwaukee, WI

Re: public record #27116
07/02/03 07:10 PM
07/02/03 07:10 PM
R
resqcapt19  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2000
Posts: 2,148
IL
Russ,
Quote
I know I'm a bit simple-minded,but wouldn't it be easier for all concerned to make the Nec exactly what it says and have 1 code nationwide?

Can't be done. The adoption of building codes by the federal government would be unconstitutional. That type of legislation is reserved to state and local governments. Of course with Ashcroft in power who knows what rights the federal government will trample on next.
Don


Don(resqcapt19)
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
Radar
Radar
Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 349
Joined: April 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
sparky 23
Admin 20
Potseal 13
Popular Topics(Views)
243,515 Are you busy
180,312 Re: Forum
170,808 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.019s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 1.0248 MB (Peak: 1.1995 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-01-17 05:15:37 UTC