ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
dsk 3
Recent Posts
High Leg Delta, phase angles
by gfretwell. 06/27/17 12:17 PM
Mains supply in GDR
by Texas_Ranger. 06/27/17 07:44 AM
Feed to spa panel
by HotLine1. 06/25/17 05:28 PM
Weatherhead, POA, height?
by HotLine1. 06/24/17 02:37 PM
Windows 7 update problem
by ampherder. 06/21/17 07:01 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
238,265 Are you busy
173,477 Re: Forum
166,281 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 55 guests, and 13 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#216940 - 03/16/16 11:40 AM Confusion with 250.90 (2011)  
BigB  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 719
Tucson, AZ USA
250.92(B) says bonding jumpers....shall be used around impaired connections..... and in the same paragraph goes on to say that standard lock nuts or bushings shall not be the only means for the bonding required by this section. I thought the second sentence referred back to the first sentence where jumpers are required around impaired connections. An associate says no, the second sentence refers to all connections on the utility side of the service whether impaired or not.

Further confusion arises in 250.92(B)(3) where it allows threadless connectors made up wrench tight. What is the difference if a threadless connector is used with a standard lock nut versus a threaded piece of RMC using standard lock nuts?

Last edited by BigB; 03/16/16 11:41 AM.

2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides

#216944 - 03/18/16 10:41 AM Re: Confusion with 250.90 (2011) [Re: BigB]  
HotLine1  Online Content


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,833
Brick, NJ USA
BigB:

Utility requirements may be 'above and beyond' NEC rules.


John

#216951 - 03/19/16 12:00 AM Re: Confusion with 250.90 (2011) [Re: HotLine1]  
BigB  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 719
Tucson, AZ USA
Originally Posted by HotLine1
BigB:

Utility requirements may be 'above and beyond' NEC rules.


Not our POCO. The only thing they are concerned with is their ability to access the meter for non-payment lockout and that their side is locked and sealed.



Member Spotlight
Lostazhell
Lostazhell
Bakersfield, CA (Originally Orange Co.)
Posts: 1,429
Joined: February 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.012s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7520 MB (Peak: 0.8761 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-06-27 20:51:52 UTC