The load calculated for a (480X208) transformer for multifamily using the optional method (220.84)is significantly smaller than the load calculated using the regular method. It is close but it would allow a smaller transformer (750 vs. 1000). Are there any disadvantages going with the smaller size?
The advantages are smaller physical size and heat output.
I assumed he was talking about a customer owned transformer. This may be a Scott question. At say 600 KVA, is a 1000 KVA more efficient than a 750 (less heat) I also guess there are higher efficiency transformers for a few extra bucks. I don't "spec" them I only know how to inspect them
#211722 - 11/13/1310:03 AMRe: Small transformer better than over sized?
The downside that I could see would be if the actual load turned out to be the higher value and you have to go back and replace everything (on your nickel). If push came to shove, all that the customer's attorney would have to do is point out that the value determined in the Code was indeed greater than the one that you used and claim that you 'cherry picked' another calculation method that let you use the cheapest transformer.
On the other side of the coin, transformers will handle a larger load than they are nameplated at for brief periods of time and you might be okay based on the load profile of the building...but if everyone starts cooking and turns up their thermostats on the same cold winter day you might be up the proverbial creek.
CGW, I would never under-spec something like a transformer, especially where it has multiple loads on it, as you state. You always need a certain amount of operating capacity in a transformer, over and above what your maximum demand calcs tell you, to make sure you don't cause it to overheat or indeed over-saturate.
#211727 - 11/13/1312:32 PMRe: Small transformer better than over sized?
Thanks for the input. The question concerns a dry type transformer in the building (the service is 480V and the transformer is for a feeder that serves all the apartments and the 120/208 house loads). One of the main questions is - do we trust the 220.84 calculation when it is significantly higher than the 220.40 calculation? Including house load: 220.40 - 945 KVA 220.84 - 664 KVA 750KVA transformer or 1000KVA transformer?
#211728 - 11/13/1304:40 PMRe: Small transformer better than over sized?
Several years ago the US government passed an 'Energy Act'. One of the most visible outcomes was the 'killing off' of incandescent lamps, another was the requirement that small power transformers (e.g. non-utility installations) be designed with 'ideal' efficiency at 35% loading.
So a 1000kVA transformer would be most efficient at 350kVA, but it may still be less efficient than a 350kVA unit loaded to 100%.
Have you done a loss (cost of ownership) analysis yet?
#211740 - 11/14/1302:49 AMRe: Small transformer better than over sized?