ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
600 KW 120/208 3 Phase Y protection
by Yooperup. 07/24/17 12:20 PM
1913 American Electrician's Handbook
by gfretwell. 07/20/17 01:08 PM
Green House wiring
by ghost307. 07/20/17 09:10 AM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 07/18/17 08:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
239,324 Are you busy
174,793 Re: Forum
167,162 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 70 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#201104 - 05/11/11 01:36 PM Current waveform  
will_87  Offline
New Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
england
My question is this:

After finally pinning down the boss Iíve eventually convinced him we can have our equipment replaced!

We had a data logger record our equipment for one week (voltage, currents, KW, KVAr, KVA ect) and decided to use the data to compile a report to indicate the size required for install.

The question is about the current waveform results:
Do we use the maximum average RMS value (the true effective value of the waveform) or the maximum max recorded value (the amplitude) to size are equipment.

I am as you can appreciate concerned about under sizing equipment due to fault or effectively over sizing and costing the company unnecessarily

Many, many thanks in advance for your thoughts and suggestion on this!


Tools for Electricians:

#201107 - 05/11/11 09:26 PM Re: Current waveform [Re: will_87]  
Tesla  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
Sacramento, CA
All industry calcs are performed on RMS power.

True peak voltages are of concern only when designing circuits such as a low pass filter.


Tesla

#201110 - 05/12/11 06:08 AM Re: Current waveform [Re: will_87]  
will_87  Offline
New Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 5
england
Many thanks for the reply Tesla,

What if the equipment in question were an at L.V 415V system?

Would this still be the peak current and not the peak to peak current?


#201113 - 05/12/11 01:13 PM Re: Current waveform [Re: will_87]  
sabrown  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2002
Posts: 302
Ogden, Utah, USA
One weeks worth of data does not help much, but that depends on the type of equipment you are looking at. Our replies would be better if we knew what type of equipment you are looking ate. If you are looking at feeders and load centers your data would be better collected over a 6 month to one year period unless you have some way of ensuring worst case loading.

But yes still RMS current not peak to peak.

Shane


#201223 - 05/20/11 09:45 AM Re: Current waveform [Re: sabrown]  
RSmike  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 134
Holland, MI USA
I would be concerned if the peak current is waaaaay above the RMS. I'd want to know the duration of the 'peaks'.

You need to be able to supply RMS as well as the peak or you are going to starting popping fuses.

I do feel your pain. In work in a large mfg facility and it's always difficult to determine how much room is left on a bussbar without doing some data logging, field observations, and then some estimation (I hate to use the words 'best guess'). In the end that's what fuses are for.

But like sabrown sez...and unless I missed it in the thread...you'd need to tell us more about the load.


#201228 - 05/20/11 10:35 PM Re: Current waveform [Re: will_87]  
Tesla  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 1,273
Sacramento, CA
Harmonic AC waveforms dictate that Peak Voltage = 1.414 x RMS.

Unless you've introduced non-harmonic back-EMF that's your answer.



Tesla


Member Spotlight
akmaster
akmaster
alaska
Posts: 70
Joined: June 2012
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7784 MB (Peak: 0.9318 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-07-25 10:51:03 UTC