ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
twh 10
Admin 4
Recent Posts
Dryer, Range grounding from "Main" panel
by sparkync. 05/25/17 05:49 PM
210.70 / Wall Switch / When adopted?
by gfretwell. 05/24/17 09:18 PM
Any UL 508 experts out there?
by sparkyinak. 05/23/17 11:04 PM
Heat pump conundrum
by sparkyinak. 05/21/17 08:49 PM
Interesting week
by HotLine1. 05/20/17 11:57 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
236,781 Are you busy
171,799 Re: Forum
164,725 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 66 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#200413 - 03/31/11 06:39 PM Apartment question  
dodge  Offline
New Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
Vancouver Island, BC
Owner of an apartment building has been told he needs to upgrade his apartment panels because they have no main breakers.

We're having difficulty locating the rule regarding this in the code book.

Anyone know which section/# it is?

Thanks.


Tools for Electricians:

#200414 - 03/31/11 07:24 PM Re: Apartment question [Re: dodge]  
HotLine1  Offline


Member
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 6,826
Brick, NJ USA
Dodge:
Welcome to ECN, from one of the 'Jersey Guys'! One of our Canadian Members will help you out!


John

#200415 - 03/31/11 07:58 PM Re: Apartment question [Re: dodge]  
mikesh  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 613
Victoria, BC, Canada
6-206 has been interpreted to mean in the suite. Especially if the main is in a room not readily accessible to the Tennant's. IE 24/7/365 without having to awaken or call in a caretaker first.
Having said that Who ordered an upgrade? In what province and under what regulation?

Generically if the installation is well maintained and still adequately serves the purpose under which it was approved then there are no requirements to upgrade. see 2-300 to 2-322. Obviously a service upgrade could trigger the Main breaker thing in the suites.

It can be pretty hard to force upgrades without some other legislation besides the current CEC.

In BC for example most Knob and Tube replacements are forced by the Insurance industry who may also require a minimum 100 amp service. These upgrades are not mandated by the CEC at least not if the K&T is in good condition and meets the needs of the residents.

Same with a service size. A modern home must have at least a 100 amp service but in 1963 the 60 was code compliant and if the loads did not change what could justify the upgrade? Only poor maintenance, failure of the service, or a load increase or a law being passed.


#200416 - 03/31/11 08:04 PM Re: Apartment question [Re: dodge]  
twh  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 915
Regina, Sask.
You only need a combination panel if the apartment panel is a main service with the neutral grounded. If it comes from a meter bank, the main breaker for the panel is at the meters. If you see a combination panel in an apartment it's because they sometimes cost less.


#200417 - 03/31/11 08:35 PM Re: Apartment question [Re: dodge]  
twh  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 915
Regina, Sask.
The panel in the suit isn't a service. The service box is the one in the electrical room with where the neutral is grounded. Try grounding the neutral in the apartment panel and the inspector will call it a feeder circuit. Anyway, that interpretation didn't make it into appendix I, so it's just a regional thing.


#200418 - 03/31/11 09:35 PM Re: Apartment question [Re: mikesh]  
dodge  Offline
New Member
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2
Vancouver Island, BC
The company that owns the apartment building wants the upgrade...we're just giving them a quote for doing it. The owner has been told 2 different things by 2 different companies and has asked me to show them the rule pertaining to this. We're in BC - our first large apartment building job.... Are the panels required to be upgraded with main breakers? If the panels need to be upgraded with main breakers, is that going to require the rest of the apartments to be brought up to code?

Thanks for the responses and the welcome.



#200422 - 04/01/11 12:28 AM Re: Apartment question [Re: dodge]  
twh  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 915
Regina, Sask.
I wonder if mikesh has an interpretation under Appendix C9.


#200453 - 04/01/11 06:51 PM Re: Apartment question [Re: dodge]  
mikesh  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 613
Victoria, BC, Canada
From directive D-E3 070302 6 Revision 1

I offered 6-206 but the Directive refers to 14-406 which requires a control device to be readily accessible.

This directive can be found on the BCSA website.
It answers dodge's question directly as he is in BC so this applys. A combo panel is required. sorry for the wrong rule I referred to in my first try at this question.


#200455 - 04/01/11 08:29 PM Re: Apartment question [Re: dodge]  
twh  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 915
Regina, Sask.
That's a funny directive. It states:
Quote
14-106 requires overcurrent devices to be readily accessible. Readily accessible is interpreted to be in the occupancy that the circuits serve.
How does putting an overcurrent device in the suite make the overcurrent device in the main electrical room accessible? Does that interpretation not specifically prohibit putting any overcurrent device in the electrical room, including the one that protects the feeder to the suite?



Member Spotlight
Joe Tedesco
Joe Tedesco
Boston, Massachusetts USA
Posts: 2,749
Joined: October 2000
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8029 MB (Peak: 0.9731 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-26 01:41:18 UTC