ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
dsk 13
Admin 4
Recent Posts
electircal ageing test on IPC
by SIAME. 08/15/17 02:43 AM
electrical aging test on IPC
by gfretwell. 08/15/17 12:27 AM
Bathroom electrical
by gfretwell. 08/14/17 02:05 AM
"Line level" audio on Cat 5?
by gfretwell. 08/08/17 10:39 PM
Fire alarm phone lines and color coding
by gfretwell. 08/08/17 10:26 PM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
Popular Topics(Views)
239,874 Are you busy
175,432 Re: Forum
167,722 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 36 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#183563 - 01/14/09 07:07 PM 347V - Unbalanced neutral is dangerous  
easyeasy  Offline
New Member
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2
Toronto
Hi Guys, Happy New Year,just a quick question, I was told in a 347V system (high bay lighting) the neutral can kill even if the breaker is OFF for that phase, so therefore you must turn off all 3 phases that's sharing that neutral. Is this so, or turning OFF the breaker that's only for that phase is good enough?
Thanks in advance for all replies and have a great day.


Tools for Electricians:

#183566 - 01/14/09 08:10 PM Re: 347V - Unbalanced neutral is dangerous [Re: easyeasy]  
ghost307  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 907
Chicago Illinois USA
Yep, that shared neutral can bite ya.
It's still carrying the return current for the other 2 phases.


Ghost307

#183579 - 01/14/09 09:49 PM Re: 347V - Unbalanced neutral is dangerous [Re: easyeasy]  
Trumpy  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,217
SI,New Zealand
Hi there,
I was under the impression that with poly-phase circuits, any circuit protection was required to de-energise all phase conductors at the same time, not only for worker safety reasons, but for the protection of motors (ie: Single-phasing protection).
I thought that was what they made 3 pole breakers for?

But yes Ghost is correct, however in any well-balanced 3-phase system, the neutral carries little or no return current.
Having said that, when have you last seen a perfectly balanced 3-phase system?

One other thing, some people seem to think that the neutral is dead (with it being called the "grounded" conductor in the circuit (even single phase circuits), this idea has killed I don't know how many electricians working in panels and DIYer's at light fittings.
It's not dead unless there is no power on the circuit at all.

Last edited by Trumpy; 01/14/09 09:56 PM. Reason: To add extra things

Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

#183607 - 01/16/09 12:47 AM Re: 347V - Unbalanced neutral is dangerous [Re: Trumpy]  
pdh  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 354
If the path being considered is neutral to ground, then the voltage you would get by touching the neutral when grounded, is the voltage drop that is present as a result of the current flowing on the neutral across the resistance of that neutral back to the point of bonding to ground. That wouldn't be zero when there is some current (and there will be if one phase of three is open and the others are conducting). But it wouldn't be that high unless there is something wrong with the neutral wiring (e.g. open or loose neutral). In adverse conditions, the neutral voltage relative to ground can be dangerous. In normal conditions it shouldn't be very much. How much voltage drop is considered acceptable on a 600/347 service?


#183906 - 01/26/09 03:46 PM Re: 347V - Unbalanced neutral is dangerous [Re: pdh]  
mikesh  Offline
Member
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 613
Victoria, BC, Canada
The Canadian Electrical code does not allow a neutral size reduction for the identified conductor in a 4 wire 3 phase Electric discharge lighting circuit. It also requires you to count the neutral as a current carrying conductor when applying ampacities in a raceway.
For some reason the neutral in discharge lighting always carries current even when balanced and it is equal to phase current.
In terms of danger this is a case where the white wire is dangerous. If feeding 3 heating circuits the neutral might carry no current if perfectly balanced. Of course you never want to be the resistor in series with any current path. The white wire never seems to be correctly named in these discussions as it is not a true neutral in many circuits. It is always supposed to be the grounded circuit conductor or identified conductor but is only a neutral when it only carries unbalanced current. In a discharge lighting circuit it is definitely not a neutral
3 X 1 pole breakers are permitted and is considered to be 3 separate circuits. A 3 phase motor would require a 3 pole breaker as it is 1 circuit.



Member Spotlight
Attic Rat
Attic Rat
Bergen Co.,N.J. USA
Posts: 524
Joined: December 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.012s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7703 MB (Peak: 0.9132 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-08-17 11:47:11 UTC