ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Recent Posts
Feed to spa panel
by gfretwell. 06/24/17 10:22 PM
Weatherhead, POA, height?
by HotLine1. 06/24/17 02:37 PM
Windows 7 update problem
by ampherder. 06/21/17 07:01 AM
Norwegian power?
by dsk. 06/19/17 03:40 PM
Anyone ever take a Furnas A14D drum sw apart?
by gfretwell. 06/17/17 08:14 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
238,208 Are you busy
173,424 Re: Forum
166,239 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 50 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#172030 - 12/11/07 09:57 AM 8/3wg romex  
sparkync  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 821
NC
According to the wire table 310-16 ( 99 Code Book, I don't have my new book with me) # 8 wire is good for 50 amps in the 75 degree column, and I know this is good only if the terminals are rated 75 degrees, which they are. Does
8/3 with ground romex qualify for this rating also? I had an inspector tell me once that it didn't, but I can't find where he would have got that from unless it was in an old code at the time. Thanks, Steve...


Work Gear for Electricians and the Trades

#172031 - 12/11/07 10:30 AM Re: 8/3wg romex [Re: sparkync]  
earlydean  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 751
Griswold, CT, USA
He is maybe refering to 334.80, which limits the ampacity of NM cables to that of the 60 degree column.


Earl

#172034 - 12/11/07 12:37 PM Re: 8/3wg romex [Re: earlydean]  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,085
Estero,Fl,usa
Yup that is what he is talking about and you can't get away with the "round up" trick you can with #6 since 40 is a standard breaker size. Even if you decide to go for SE/SER you still can't use the 75c column because of 338.10(B)(4)


Greg Fretwell

#172072 - 12/11/07 11:45 PM Re: 8/3wg romex [Re: gfretwell]  
KJay  Offline
Member
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 763
MA, USA
Hi Greg,
I could be wrong, but I thought 338.10(B)4 excluded 334.80 Ampacity. confused


#172079 - 12/12/07 01:36 AM Re: 8/3wg romex [Re: KJay]  
gfretwell  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,085
Estero,Fl,usa
You are right. I should try to read a little better before I speak. My original thought was that it was OK, then I looked it up. wink


Greg Fretwell


Member Spotlight
Potseal
Potseal
Saskatchewan
Posts: 225
Joined: February 2013
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.014s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7679 MB (Peak: 0.9103 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-06-25 15:45:29 UTC