ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
VDE 0100 to introduce AFCIs
by sparky. 01/20/18 05:09 PM
MRI LED lights dimmer control replacement - wow!
by Potseal. 01/19/18 08:52 PM
Video: Inventor of the GFCI self-testing shocks
by Bill Addiss. 01/17/18 11:11 PM
FPE in Germany
by HotLine1. 01/17/18 07:07 PM
Fujifilm Recalls Power Adapter Wall Plugs
by Admin. 01/16/18 07:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
SE cable question
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (sparky), 10 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
Bonding Survey #169216
09/28/07 10:51 PM
09/28/07 10:51 PM
S
sparkyinak  Offline OP
Member
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 1,328
Alaska
I would like to throw this out to you all. An issue I keep running into is what size bonding wire to use to bond the hot water pipes and the cold water pipes at the water heater. This can apply to other equipment such as water filters, softeners, and other similar equipment. I have gotten many different answers however there is only one in my code book. Here is the scenario:

You are wiring an 8 unit apartment building. The service is an 800 amps fed with a lateral service of 2 sets of 500mcm cables from the utility’s transformer to the building’s 800 amp disconnect. The disconnect feeds a meter stack that holds a meter and a 125 amp breaker for each unit. Each of those breakers feed a panel in each unit with a set of #2 wires and a #6 ground. The 800 amp service is grounded with a Ufer, a couple ground rods and a bare 2/0 going to the main water line.

The water system is supplied by a 4” steel water line from the city that is greter the 10 feet long. From there it is all copper throughout the building. Each unit is fed with a ¾” waterline that splits off to feed the cold water faucets and a line goes to feed the 4500 watt electric water heater. From the water heater, the hot water is then supplied throughout the unit to the hot water faucets. This is repeated in each unit so each unit has its own water heater and each water heater has dielectric fittings.

The questions:
1. Would you bond the hot and cold water lines together?
2. If so, what size of the bonding jumper would use to include the code reference?
3. If the dielectric fittings were not in the water heater, would you still bond the two together?

If this post looks familiar, I have posted this on other message boards. I feel that is an important area that is over looked and often misunderstood.

FYI the wire sizes are correct and they do meet code.


"Live Awesome!" - Kevin Carosa
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: Bonding Survey [Re: sparkyinak] #169223
09/29/07 04:13 AM
09/29/07 04:13 AM
Scott35  Offline

Broom Pusher and
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,708
Anaheim, CA. USA
I would have to say, if "Supplimental Bonding" was required (supplimented by a Conductor, as the Hot & Cold are physically bonded at each mixing valve), it would be done for each unit - likely at the Water Heater its self, using a Conductor sized to the largest circuit value of that unit (largest OCPD in the unit's Panelboard).

If there may be issues where the Tenant's Feeder(s) could energize the Hot Water Pipes, then the Bonding Conductor would be sized according to the OCPD of the Tenant's Feeder.

This _SHOULD_ fall under article 250-122, like an Equipment Grounding Conductor.

Fire away!!! shocked

Scott


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!
Re: Bonding Survey [Re: Scott35] #169237
09/29/07 11:17 AM
09/29/07 11:17 AM
G
gfretwell  Offline

Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,166
Estero,Fl,usa
250.104(A)(1)The bonding jumper(s) shall be sized in accordance with Table 250.66 except as permitted in 250.104(A)(2) and (A)(3).

(2) ...the individual occupancies is metallically isolated from all other occupancies by use of nonmetallic water piping... 250.122

(3) ... 250.66 again

It sure sounds like 250.66 to me.


Greg Fretwell
Re: Bonding Survey [Re: gfretwell] #169241
09/29/07 01:22 PM
09/29/07 01:22 PM
G
George Little  Offline
Member
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,489
Michigan USA
Greg- You are 100% correct. IMHO 250.66 applies for system bonding and 250.122 applies for equipment bonding.


George Little
Re: Bonding Survey [Re: George Little] #169256
09/30/07 05:46 AM
09/30/07 05:46 AM
I
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
For water line bonding it's 250.66 although I do not know why it could not be 250.122


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts
Re: Bonding Survey [Re: iwire] #169261
09/30/07 10:26 AM
09/30/07 10:26 AM
G
gfretwell  Offline

Member
Joined: Jul 2004
Posts: 9,166
Estero,Fl,usa
I do tend to agree with the concept of bonding based on the "circuit likely to energize" when you have isolated sections of any kind of pipe. You are still oblgated to use 250.66 for the general bonding of water pipe systems.


Greg Fretwell

Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
waymag
waymag
dallas, texas, USA
Posts: 67
Joined: January 2002
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 20
sparky 16
Potseal 15
Popular Topics(Views)
243,576 Are you busy
180,374 Re: Forum
170,852 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.022s Queries: 15 (0.005s) Memory: 0.9780 MB (Peak: 1.1221 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-01-21 14:30:25 UTC