ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
VDE 0100 to introduce AFCIs
by sparky. 01/20/18 05:09 PM
MRI LED lights dimmer control replacement - wow!
by Potseal. 01/19/18 08:52 PM
Video: Inventor of the GFCI self-testing shocks
by Bill Addiss. 01/17/18 11:11 PM
FPE in Germany
by HotLine1. 01/17/18 07:07 PM
Fujifilm Recalls Power Adapter Wall Plugs
by Admin. 01/16/18 07:04 PM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
SE cable question
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (sparky), 10 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
EMT for GEC #163181
05/03/07 10:54 AM
05/03/07 10:54 AM
Admin  Offline
OP
Administrator
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,481
NY, USA
Quote
Aside from from a few other obvious violations, I have a question about the EMT protecting the GEC. No bonding jumpers, required by 250.64(E) and 250.92(A)(3). Opening not adequately closed, per 312.5(A). The question is: Can 300.15 be cited for the lack of conduit fitting entering the LB? Is there a better Code reference?

Thanks,
Kevin Duke



[Linked Image]


Last edited by electure; 05/03/07 07:12 PM. Reason: Removed 2nd picture
2017 / 2014 NEC & Related Books and Study Guides
Re: EMT for GEC [Re: Admin] #163190
05/03/07 03:21 PM
05/03/07 03:21 PM
J
JJM  Offline
Member
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 100
Definitely a violation of 250.93(A)(3). Essentialy the GEC is now a choke, and is almost useless to safely diverty fault current. I believe we've had discussions on this before.

Assuming PVC is acceptable by local code to protect the GEC, that's what should've been used - with proper fittings and no opening like what's pictured. Here in NYC, our local code requires the GEC to be protected in metal conduit, of course bonded at both ends to comply with 250.92(A)(3). RMC or IMC outdoors, EMT indoors. Depending on the inspector, you can sometimes get by with Greefield indoors because it's still considered "protected".

300.15 could apply... while a box or conduit body is installed, in this case the conduit body isn't installed right or as listed, and certainly isn't "workmanlike" in any way.

Joe

Re: EMT for GEC [Re: Admin] #163287
05/05/07 01:20 PM
05/05/07 01:20 PM
B
BigJohn  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 391
Boston, MA
Aside from the violation of protecting the GEC like that, I think you might cite 300.10:
Quote
Electrical Continuity of Metal Raceways and Enclosures: Metal raceways, cable armor, and other metal enclusres for conductors shall be metallically joined together into a continuous electric conductor and shall be connected to all boxes, fittings, and cabinets so as to provide effective electrical continuity. Unless specifically permitted elsewhere in this Code, raceways and cable assemblies shall be mechanically secured to boxes, fittings, cabinets and other enclosures.
My emphasis on the part that seems to apply.

-John


Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
waymag
waymag
dallas, texas, USA
Posts: 67
Joined: January 2002
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 20
sparky 16
Potseal 15
Popular Topics(Views)
243,576 Are you busy
180,374 Re: Forum
170,852 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.020s Queries: 15 (0.004s) Memory: 0.9512 MB (Peak: 1.0764 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-01-21 12:38:08 UTC