ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
How do you find a good employee?
by HotLine1. 04/22/17 10:44 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,765 Are you busy
169,519 Re: Forum
162,801 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (gfretwell), 62 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
Page 1 of 3 1 2 3
#145055 - 03/03/06 08:59 AM Direct Burial vs Conduit?  
Trumpy  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,211
SI,New Zealand
Folks,
I'd like your opinions on this method of burying cables.
Over here in New Zealand, you are allowed to direct bury Neutral-Screened cable, provided it has an Outer sheath of 3.2mm thickness and it is buried in "fine sand".
This means no de-rating and no further protection.
Once covered over the cable is "there", stuck there as it is.
I was always bought up with this method of laying cables, as an EC.
But one thing the other day made me think otherwise.
Drawing wires or cables has got easier since we used Conduit wires in PVC conduits and we have lubes to help us.
What is your preferred method?.
We have up to 200mm dia conduit and if you can't get a cable through that you've got problems.
It also makes replacement or drawing in new wiring easier.
Take your pick. [Linked Image]


Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

Test Equipment:
Large Selection of Test Equipment For Electrical, HVAC, Test & Measurement
Large Selection of Test Equipment For Electrical, HVAC, Test & Measurement

#145056 - 03/03/06 11:26 AM Re: Direct Burial vs Conduit?  
renosteinke  Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Blue Collar Country
Apart from the issue of protection, I like pipe for two reasons: Changes and cheaters!

Pipe allows you to later upgrade the system by pulling new wire. Since I hate digging, using pipe meand never having to dig again.

We have rules, as well, regarding depth of burial and the use of "clean fill." In my experience, however, the folks who use direct-burial cable rarely place the cable more than a few inches deep, and are quite likely to lay rocks right atop the cable!

So, from my point of view, I've come to associate direct burial cable with lousy installations.


#145057 - 03/03/06 07:30 PM Re: Direct Burial vs Conduit?  
Alan Belson  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,803
Mayenne N. France
Mike, don't you have to put some sort of 'marker' tape over the buried cable to warn future diggers? [ no offense, Aussies! ]
Agreed Reno, the bodge artistes are never short of crackpot ideas, like the pillock in Bath, England, who decided to dig a cellar under his stone-built house. The whole structure fell into the massive hole and killed him. On one memorable occasion in a house renovation, I found under a damp patch in the plaster, a partly-burned log, obviously straight out of the fireplace, set neatly in mortar in an inside wall at sill height. The 'DIY' previous owner must have run out of bricks and improvised! We had visions of him laying it with firetongs to avoid burning himself!

Alan


Wood work but can't!

#145058 - 03/04/06 09:38 AM Re: Direct Burial vs Conduit?  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
I don't know about the heavy industrial side of things, but for lighter duty such as domestic and small commercial, I'd say that direct-burial SWA is far-and-away the most common method here (not counting homeowner specials such as flexible cords pulled through garden hose, etc. [Linked Image] ).

Most of you already know what SWA looks like, but just in case:

[Linked Image]

It's widely available in 2-, 3- and 4-core variants with conductor sizes from 1.5 sq mm upward.
http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Main_Index/Cable_Index/Armoured_SWA/index.html


#145059 - 03/04/06 09:48 AM Re: Direct Burial vs Conduit?  
briselec  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 141
Brisbane, Australia
About 3 years ago we upgraded a shopping centre and installed parallel 240mm² cables for the mains. 70 metres of the run was in a garden bed between the trees and the kerb with 3 detours around drains. Just the thought of how much work it would take to do in conduit made me decide to bury it direct.


#145060 - 03/04/06 03:46 PM Re: Direct Burial vs Conduit?  
Wolfgang  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 153
the very West of Germany
In Germany you bury cables usually directly, minimum 0.3m without or 0.6m with traffic . Cooling is better than in a conduit, so you can uprate them and refer to 15°C external temperature. Furthermore, also in a conduit you will have to use the same cable, as there are no ground water(is often a bit acid) resistant wires. Buried conduits are not regarded as water tight except short distances (< 10m from cellar to cellar) where the conduit is well accessible and has a defined slope.

There are cable types with concentric (PE connected) shield, which are rarely used, as more expensive. Normal unshielded earth type cables (called NYY) are not regarded as dangerous.

And as already mentioned in other threads in German towns usually everything arrives underground and without conduits: phone, cable tv, electricity, gas and water. You are supposed to lay either a coloured information tape or special plastic protection or bricks above the cables.


#145061 - 03/05/06 05:45 PM Re: Direct Burial vs Conduit?  
Texas_Ranger  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2001
Posts: 2,393
Vienna, Austria
Utilities usually bury directly here. Cable, then sand, then bricks, then marker tape or 4mm(?) sheet plastic (yellow, with warnings printed on), then more sand and finally gravel or soil. Seen it quite often during the last few years... in 1991 we got all new phone lines in the street, a few years after cable TV (fiber optical) was installed, then we got a new power feeder... and last year when they replaced the gas mains some cable protection showed too. In case of the PVC gas lines they even poured concrete atop of the pipes, down in the trench and then backfilled with soil.


#145062 - 03/05/06 06:02 PM Re: Direct Burial vs Conduit?  
Wolfgang  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 153
the very West of Germany
@Texas_ranger:

Sure about PVC, not HDPE for gas??


#145063 - 03/06/06 04:31 AM Re: Direct Burial vs Conduit?  
Trumpy  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,211
SI,New Zealand
Alan,
Yes, you are required to provide a "Signal Strip" at half trench depth.
But with the types of excavator operators we have here these days, they are either colour-blind or couldn't give a toss.
Umm Dirt Brown- Signal Strip Orange, must mean keep digging.
One thing I will say though.
That SWA cable would last 5 minutes here under some of our digger operators.
We tried to train a few of them to the PoCo way of thinking, 2 came out as good operators.
1 died since from a heart attack.
Geoff is our man.
Working an excavator is something that takes real skill, I'm a kid as far as that is concerned.


Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

#145064 - 03/06/06 07:42 AM Re: Direct Burial vs Conduit?  
briselec  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 141
Brisbane, Australia
Quote
Mike, don't you have to put some sort of 'marker' tape over the buried cable to warn future diggers? [ no offense, Aussies! ]

Here in OZ when cable is buried direct you have to install a thick protective strip. It's not a code requirement to install a marker tape for underground conduit but it's often done anyway. It's amazing how often you find it sitting on top of the conduit which makes the exercise pointless.


Page 1 of 3 1 2 3

Member Spotlight
watersparkfalls
watersparkfalls
Washington...Not DC
Posts: 216
Joined: March 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 15 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8222 MB (Peak: 0.9959 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-27 01:30:34 UTC