ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
Electrode boilers question
by annemarie1. 04/27/17 01:40 PM
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
Dimmable LED 2x4 lay in fixtures
by HotLine1. 04/24/17 05:43 PM
Old decora style outlets
by Lostazhell. 04/22/17 07:59 PM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by gfretwell. 04/22/17 01:11 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
234,842 Are you busy
169,616 Re: Forum
162,870 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
1 registered members (mbhydro), 62 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#140464 - 03/12/04 08:39 AM 7671 reference methods  
james S  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 107
West England
when looking up current carrying capacities in the 7671 regulations ( IEE ) how would you decide which reference method to use if there where two used in the intallation in question eg if general twin core and earth cable was to run for 10 mtr clipped dirrect and then a further 10 mtr enclosed in a wall?between these two methods the diffrence can be as much as 15 amps [Linked Image]

or is it educated guess time?


Test Equipment:
Large Selection of Test Equipment For Electrical, HVAC, Test & Measurement
Large Selection of Test Equipment For Electrical, HVAC, Test & Measurement

#140465 - 03/12/04 11:14 AM Re: 7671 reference methods  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
James,
The ratings are based on the maximum temperature at which the cable should be allowed to run, hence the fact that the "clipped direct" rating is higher because it will lose heat to the surrounding air more quickly than an enclosed cable. (The "clipped direct" ratings are too high in the current Regs., in my not-so-humble opinion, but that's another story. [Linked Image])

So in the situation you describe, you would have to go with the lower current and limit the cable to its enclosed rating.


#140466 - 03/12/04 12:26 PM Re: 7671 reference methods  
james S  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 107
West England
just to clear it up then no matter what reference method used always go with the smallest rating method!
ie if there was again two core and earth cable to run 20 mtrs cliped direct and 1 mtr to drop down to fuse board in a insulated wall the insulated wall factor would be the factor used?

sorry to drag this one out but i think the regs fall down on scenarios such as this especialy when there is such a diffrence in carrying capacities involved!


#140467 - 03/12/04 01:14 PM Re: 7671 reference methods  
C-H  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,497
Stockholm, Sweden
James,

The copper leads the heat away along the cable. This means that the current carrying capacity is higher than otherwise if the cable is enclosed or exposed to a higher than normal ambient temperature only for a short distance. I don't know if, and if so how, this is reflected in the IEE regulations, but it is likely that there are special provisions for this case. This doesn't mean you can use the clipped directly/free air value, but you may be able to use a higher value than that of a cable enclosed in an insulated wall for an indefinite length.


#140468 - 03/14/04 04:18 AM Re: 7671 reference methods  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
Yes, as C-H says, where the length of cable in insulation is only very short, it is permissible to use a higher rating.

Here's an extract from the Electrician's Guide:
http://www.tlc-direct.co.uk/Book/4.3.6.htm



Member Spotlight
RH1
RH1
California
Posts: 22
Joined: August 2009
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.012s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7684 MB (Peak: 0.9074 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-04-28 00:28:08 UTC