I looked at a table with AWG to mm² conversions and it occured to me the sizes are very close to each other. If you fit the AWG to a metric size: E.g. #18 to 0.80 mm², #17 to 1.00 mm² and #16 to 1.25 mm² you end up with something that is only five percent or less smaller than the true value.
As I know that these 1.25 mm², 2.00 mm² etc. sizes are used in some countries, I got the idea to devise a new wire gauge. Let's call it MWG, Metric/Metricated(???)/Metrified(???) Wire Gauge.
I see where you're coming from on this, but as any new system would run alongside existing standards rather than replacing it (at least in the short term), I can't help thinking that it would result in some confusion.
Re: AWG to MWG?#137703 07/31/0312:52 PM07/31/0312:52 PM
As you can see, the difference is significant only for sizes 0 and larger.
At the same time, anyone familiar with metric sizes will object. Quite correctly: The last few sizes in the first message don't exist. For some reason the sizes leave logic after 25mm². Instead of 40 like you would expect, they have choosen 35. And this then goes on with illogical sizes like 95mm². The whole thing should be reworked.
Here's the MCM to actual metric to my suggested 'rough' conversion. Why are there so many MCM sizes? You can't possibly stock them all.
I see no reason to introduce a new wiring gauge standard just because the Americans have to be different from everyone else. If the present square millimetre standard is the most universal, then it is up to countries like the US to adopt it.
However, if the Americans want to be different and keep their wire standard, they can at least establish new names for their wires (based on the information in your chart) on the square millimetre designation.
The advantage to this for both the US and the world would be the ease at comparing sizes. Without a chart handy, one only can guess if a 2.50 mm² can be used in place of a #14 AWG. If the Americans renamed #14 AWG as 2.00 mm², then it is obvious that 2.50 mm² can be used in applicatons where 2.00 mm² is specified, but not the reverse.
Most of the Asian countries do not use the same sizes as the Europeans. The 1.25 mm² and 2.00 mm² you referance are two of the sizes used in Asia. The Asian sizes may have been based on the AWG standard, but long ago adopted to the square millimetre naming designation. In other words, they may be using the AWG sizes with a square millimetre designation. The two "standards" are easily comparable as a result.
All the Americans need do is investigate if the Asian sizes can safely be used in the US and if they can, it would be so easy just to adopt new names without changing anything or changing it ever so slightly.
The only reason the Americans won't do it is because of attitude. We are better then everyone else. They must change to our ways, not us to the theirs. The only reason for the resistance to adopting SI in the US is because the Americans are afraid the world would interpret the change as the US having been wrong for 200 years and gods are never wrong. So, everything is done the hard way. The US is only hurting itself.
Re: AWG to MWG?#137705 07/31/0301:40 PM07/31/0301:40 PM
One shouldn't harmonise for the sake of harmonisation. However, I know that the Americans wire manufacturers are trying to figure out a way of harmonising the mm2 with the MCM and AWG system since they want to sell abroad. The sheer number of AWG to mm2 tables on the net indicate that people often have to convert. Just not for electrical stuff, but electronics, audio gear and various strange things.
Just like you point out, the Asian countries (including Japan and Korea) are using metric versions of the AWG. I've looked at the Japanese sizes, and either I've got something wrong they have been converting a bit at random since some sizes are rather strange, like 5.5, 14 and 22mm².
[This message has been edited by C-H (edited 07-31-2003).]
Re: AWG to MWG?#137706 07/31/0303:31 PM07/31/0303:31 PM
One shouldn't harmonise for the sake of harmonisation
I agree entirely -- Which is why there is no need for America to change its wire sizes at all.
AWG has been the standard in the U.S. (and beyond) for decades, and introducing a new system would result in unnecessary confusion.
It seems to me that the ROW (Rest Of World) is frequently berating America for not falling into line with "established international standards," whether those standards are electrical or anything else.
I see the situation from the point of view that America already has its own standards which are perfectly satisfactory and understood right across the country. (And in many cases, the American standards have been in use much longer than the Johnny-come-lately ROW standards.)
If it ain't broke, don't fix it!
Re: AWG to MWG?#137708 07/31/0311:32 PM07/31/0311:32 PM
The US doesn't have to change the physical suze of its wire, just give the wire a square millimetre name.
If the US was an isolated country or a net exporter like it was 30 years ago or more, then there would be no need to make any changes.
But, that is no longer the case. American differences cause grief to both sides, in the form of errors and economy.
With the US continuing to export its manufaturing and now engineering base, it becomes even more important to harmonise. It isn't harmonsing for the sake of harmonising, it is harmonising for the sake of safety and economy.
With huge deficits, the rise of the euro against the dollar and the demise of dollar hegemony, the US is either going to have bend some towards harmonising or suffer the consequences of being different when it can no longer afford to be so.
Re: AWG to MWG?#137709 08/01/0309:48 AM08/01/0309:48 AM
My point is that the American electricians wouldn't know that they had a new system. The difference is to small to need any adjustment in ampacity. Only the engineers and the cable manufacturers would know that an adjustment has taken place. And those who for one reason or another want to use the advantage of metric sizes. (Like being able to calculate voltage drop in a run on the back of an envelope, without a table)
Re: AWG to MWG?#137710 08/01/0302:25 PM08/01/0302:25 PM
You can look at the 600V cables. It looks like the Koreans and the Japanese follow the American colour code, use their own sizes and have European-inspired cable designations. You will find the ampacities for the cables too.
Anyway, the wire sizes in these tables are as follows: (* indicates that it coincides with my suggested sizes)