ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Shout Box
Recent Posts
AreMetal Ladders Ever OK For Electrical Work?
by gfretwell. 01/22/18 01:15 AM
VDE 0100 to introduce AFCIs
by sparky. 01/20/18 05:09 PM
MRI LED lights dimmer control replacement - wow!
by Potseal. 01/19/18 08:52 PM
Video: Inventor of the GFCI self-testing shocks
by Bill Addiss. 01/17/18 11:11 PM
New in the Gallery:
Housebilding DIY wiring
SE cable question
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 12 guests, and 10 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate Thread
lost neutral question #128618
07/19/03 06:28 PM
07/19/03 06:28 PM
D
ds247  Offline OP
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18
California
A while back I came home and some lighting circuits were dim. I checked the voltage at the main box before the main breaker and one power leg to neutral was about 150 volts but the other power leg to neutral was about 90 volts. The local utility sent a lineman out and after finding no bad connections, he concluded (rightly) that the neutral wire from the pole was cut. My question is: why didn't both read the same since the neutral was connected to the house ground? Thanks.

Tools for Electricians:
Re: lost neutral question #128619
07/22/03 12:01 PM
07/22/03 12:01 PM
C
C-H  Offline
Member
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 1,497
Stockholm, Sweden
Quote
why didn't both read the same since the neutral was connected to the house ground?


The resistance of the soil around the ground rod is very high in comparison to the other condutors. This means that you can pretty much ignore the ground in the calculation.

The voltage in either leg is simply a result of the load on it. If you have no load on one leg, you'll have 240V to neutral on the other. If the load on both legs is equal the voltage vill be 120V on both legs.

The question is: Does the ground rod keep the grounded conductor at ground potential, or does the ground rod keep the ground at the grounded conductor's potential? Contrary to conventional wisdom, I hold the latter to be true.

Re: lost neutral question #128620
07/22/03 02:46 PM
07/22/03 02:46 PM
B
Bjarney  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
West-Southern Inner-Northeast ...
This is the rationale behind NEC250-2(d): The earth shall not be used as the sole equipment grounding conductor or fault current path. For low-voltage systems, earth return is a very poor way to limit potential difference and facilitate rapid operation of overcurrent devices

Re: lost neutral question #128621
07/22/03 03:45 PM
07/22/03 03:45 PM
D
ds247  Offline OP
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 18
California
Does this mean that when we ground devices, tools, machines, etc. that maybe things are not nearly as safe as we assume because of the relatively high resistance of the soil around the grounding rod?

Re: lost neutral question #128622
07/22/03 04:53 PM
07/22/03 04:53 PM
B
Bjarney  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Apr 2002
Posts: 2,527
West-Southern Inner-Northeast ...
ds — As I read the Code, it means just the opposite—never expect an earth return to substitute for metallic bonding.

Re: lost neutral question #128623
07/22/03 05:51 PM
07/22/03 05:51 PM
P
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
DS,
We have a discussion going in the non-U.S. area at the moment which includes TT vs. TN-C-S grounding systems.

Many homes in Britain and Europe have exactly the situation you describe: The buildings sole ground connection is a rod, with no bonding to the neutral. The overall impedance of the circuit in such an installation means that even a direct phase-to-ground short doesn't result in enough current to open a normal OCPD, so everything has to be GFI-protected.

Grounding just to a rod without such protection is practically ineffective, as a ground fault will just result in a couple of amps (or less) flowing back to the supply through the earth and the frame of the faulty appliance rising to supply potential.

Such installations are banned in America by the code section BJ quoted above.

Re: lost neutral question #128624
07/22/03 11:41 PM
07/22/03 11:41 PM
Scott35  Offline

Broom Pusher and
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 2,708
Anaheim, CA. USA
Someone cut the noodle at the Transformer???
Funny how far some jokers will go to be A@SES!!! [Linked Image]

Nevertheless, everyone has given excellent descriptions of the odd voltage readings.
Whatever the loads (the connected equipment) are, resulted in an array of series connected stuff (unless loads are meant to be L-L / 240 VAC connected). The loads with higher Impedance resulted in a higher voltage across them.
Eventually everything worked out to be 150 VAC and 90 VAC to the center point.

If the PoCo's mid point ground bond was still connected at the Transformer, that would result in a slight trickle of current finding its way back to the Transformer via the Earth ground. This would probably raise the L-G voltage even higher than 150 VAC if there were less or lighter loads connected - or if voltage was checked with a Hi input Z meter, but who knows?!?!?!

Open Noodle situations really suck!

Scott35


Scott " 35 " Thompson
Just Say NO To Green Eggs And Ham!

Featured:

2017 Master Electrician Exam Preparation Combos
2017 NEC Electrician
Exam Prep Combos:
Master / Journeyman

 

Member Spotlight
dougwells
dougwells
kamloops BC Canada
Posts: 1,142
Joined: May 2003
Show All Member Profiles 
Top Posters(30 Days)
Admin 21
sparky 16
Potseal 15
Popular Topics(Views)
243,592 Are you busy
180,388 Re: Forum
170,861 Need opinion
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.1
(Release build 20180101)
Page Time: 0.017s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.9854 MB (Peak: 1.1400 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2018-01-22 12:17:06 UTC