ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
sparky 5
Recent Posts
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 04/30/17 02:30 PM
201 volt equipment?
by bigpapa. 04/29/17 12:15 AM
Schneider LC1D09
by jraef. 04/28/17 11:05 PM
Electrode boilers question
by annemarie1. 04/27/17 01:40 PM
Why cables look like they do
by LongRunner. 04/26/17 09:36 AM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
235,042 Are you busy
169,884 Re: Forum
163,072 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 66 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#122726 - 01/05/06 11:15 PM Surge Arrestor Connection  
Admin  Offline

Administrator
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,439
NY, USA
Quote
I am looking for some input on these pictures.

This is the 12KV secondary of one of two step up transformers on a rush project. I did the terminations last week prior to the transformers being delivered so that when they arrived the men on the job could just bolt them up. (I am on a job 100 miles away) They sent me these pictures today because the surge arrestors you see in the photos were not expected to be there. The concern is two fold.

1. The #6 connecting the arrestor to the HV bushing was factory installed. As you may be able to see it is a 600V THHN insulated conductor. What I have seen in the past is unshielded 15KV cable making this connection inside equipment.

2. The arrestors are mounted directly under the HV bushings and had to be loosened and pushed aside to get the power conductors landed. This moves the top terminal closer to the tank.

My suggestion, since they are owner supplied transformers, was to notify the owner/engineers of or concerns and we are awaiting there direction.

Does everyone else here see this problem??

- Nick
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


Tools for Electricians:

#122727 - 01/06/06 12:25 AM Re: Surge Arrestor Connection  
Radar  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 349
Los Angeles, CA
The problems you point out are easy to see. Does the owner have a relative in the discount transformer business? I mean, why bother with 600V insulation on a 12KV system, might as well just use bare wire.

Pretty obvious the rope-a-dopes that designed this thing have never bothered to try installing one.

Radar


There are 10 types of people. Those who know binary, and those who don't.

#122728 - 01/06/06 09:10 PM Re: Surge Arrestor Connection  
Ann Brush  Offline
Member
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 152
Ohia
Definately get someone with oversight to sign-off that you had concerns and that they chose to go with this unorthadox approach. Looks like someone ordered/supplied the wrong unit. Any chance the bushings could feed from the top, then the arrestors could be put back in place and proper straps attached.


#122729 - 01/06/06 10:44 PM Re: Surge Arrestor Connection  
Larry Fine  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 693
Richmond, VA
"Any chance the bushings could feed from the top, then the arrestors could be put back in place and proper straps attached."

My thoughts, too. Or how about a rectangular plate with 4 bolt holes that could extend the terminals away from the bushings, allowing the arrestors to be swiveled back into position.


Larry Fine
Fine Electric Co.
fineelectricco.com

#122730 - 01/07/06 01:32 AM Re: Surge Arrestor Connection  
HighPotter  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 42
So. Cal
Actually, I'm pretty sure those are Hubbell MOV style arrestors. The "600v" wiring on the line side is factory provided. The fact that it is 600v wiring is of no consequence. Keeping your distance phase to phase and phase to ground is.

That being said, installing arrestors in a padmount is a horrible design. When the arrestors blow, it is almost always violent. And they can take out the other phases in the process.


#122731 - 01/07/06 05:17 AM Re: Surge Arrestor Connection  
Trumpy  Offline


Member
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,211
SI,New Zealand
Ever wondered why they put them rubber boots on HV wires?.
It's so moisture doesn't cause a flash-over problem, it just drips off.
Considering the URD being supplied from this tranny, the feeds to the Surge Diverters looks really sloppy. [Linked Image]
600V?, nowhere near it!.


Let's face it, these days if you're not young, you're old - Red Green grin

#122732 - 01/07/06 01:54 PM Re: Surge Arrestor Connection  
Nick  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 599
Riverside, CA
"Any chance the bushings could feed from the top"

I have not seen the transformers myself except for the pictures you see. Maybe there would be enough room to form the conductors around the side and connect them at the top but at this point that is a very expensive proposition. The conductors of both transformer would have to be replaced, because I do know they are to short for that. Both ends re terminated and some bracing would have to be added in the enclosures to support the conductors. Extending the bushings with a plate could be an option if that doesn't put them to close to the doors. In fact T&B make a bracket specifically for that.
Like Radar said I don't know what they just didn't use bare wire. It's a live front transformer anyway and as long as all the clearances are met it shouldn't be a problem.
Highpotter, wouldn't the arrestors only blow if they exceeded their rating? How often does this really occur?


#122733 - 01/07/06 03:41 PM Re: Surge Arrestor Connection  
XtheEdgeX  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 116
Florida
"Ever wondered why they put them rubber boots on HV wires?.
It's so moisture doesn't cause a flash-over problem, it just drips off."
And are required on all outdoor HV connections with stress cones, similar to the one shown.


#122734 - 01/07/06 06:29 PM Re: Surge Arrestor Connection  
HighPotter  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 42
So. Cal
"Highpotter, wouldn't the arrestors only blow if they exceeded their rating? How often does this really occur?"

Lightning strike. Phase to phase fault.

Nick, when the right situation happens, they are "designed" to explode. All you find is a hanging tail with some of the arrestor still attached.

Any idea why they didnt spec out elbows, load break or deadbreak? Does the padmount have a oil switch? How is the system fed?

HP


[This message has been edited by HighPotter (edited 01-07-2006).]


#122735 - 01/07/06 10:58 PM Re: Surge Arrestor Connection  
Nick  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 599
Riverside, CA
"Any idea why they didn't spec out elbows, load break or deadbreak? Does the padmount have a oil switch? How is the system fed?"


Well, I am not sure. Like I said this is supposed to be a temporary installation. I did the first phase of this job and the scope that was discussed about this phase and what is really happening is night and day. The job is for a city that a few years ago started its own utility division. The power is feeding a few specific new customers at this site. It does not connect to the are utility grid at all. What I think is happening is politics, budget and time restraints are forcing this temp install so we can go back and build the permanent system under a reasonable construction schedule.

There are a couple 1200KW natural gas generators feeding these transformers at 480V. The transformers step the voltage up to 12.47KV then feed a piece of fused sectionalizing switch gear. From there the feed rises up a pole and runs overhead down the road. Off the pole line the feed runs underground again to a couple of pad mounts that feed the buildings. As I understand it there was supposed to be arrestors on the poles and I am not sure why they are not there. In fact, they have been installed by now. Since I haven't been back I am not sure. (We did not do the overhead work. It was a sub of the GC.)
I do not believe the transformers have oil switches in them, but again I could be wrong. I think this phase is just low budget to get the customers on line and will be gold plated later this year.



Member Spotlight
togol
togol
NW In. USA
Posts: 421
Joined: September 2005
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.015s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.8128 MB (Peak: 0.9855 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-01 02:31:22 UTC