ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
Potseal 11
Recent Posts
600 KW 120/208 3 Phase Y protection
by SteveFehr. 07/23/17 09:46 AM
1913 American Electrician's Handbook
by gfretwell. 07/20/17 01:08 PM
Green House wiring
by ghost307. 07/20/17 09:10 AM
Permit Snafus...AHJs and Contractors Jump in
by HotLine1. 07/18/17 08:06 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
239,256 Are you busy
174,671 Re: Forum
167,085 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 88 guests, and 8 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#121795 - 08/22/05 11:57 PM Up On The Roof  
Admin  Offline

Administrator
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,447
NY, USA
Quote
Apparently there was a problem with the underground feeders and they decided it would be cheaper to go over the roof. When we proposed a repair the customer's reply; "No, we haven't had any problems so lets wait until we need to make the repair." 408V 3P Parallel feeders. They must have decided a straight line was not a good idea.

Bill (LearJet9)
[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]

[Linked Image]


Tools for Electricians:

#121796 - 08/23/05 12:00 AM Re: Up On The Roof  
BigJohn  Offline
Member
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 391
Boston, MA
Reason # 271 Why I Hate PVC

-John


#121797 - 08/23/05 01:24 AM Re: Up On The Roof  
CTwireman  Offline
Member
Joined: Feb 2002
Posts: 840
Connecticut, USA
Ok, let me play devil's advocate.

Yeah, it's ugly, but I don't see any code violations other than the lack of expansion couplings. That would explain the separation.


Furthermore, if there was a problem with the underground feeders, this may well have been an emergency fix done in a hurry to get the power back on.

I look at this and say "What's the big deal?"

Peter


Peter

#121798 - 08/23/05 04:16 AM Re: Up On The Roof  
e57  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,876
S.F.,CA USA
I get the feeling that the roof is newer than the wacky run. I may have been straighter before the roofers pulled it to one side for thier work, and never put it back. The other stuff on the roof being a bit more rigid, they just lifted up, splid new roofing under, and put it back down. The very slinky PVC they just dragged around, after all, whats it gonna do? Leak?

I will eventualy fail, that guys just hoping its after he retires.


Mark Heller
"Well - I oughta....." -Jackie Gleason

#121799 - 08/23/05 07:20 AM Re: Up On The Roof  
LearJet9  Offline
Member
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 197
Millis, MA USA
e57 is correct. The roof is newer than the PVC installation. CT is also correct. The PVC "repair" was an emergency installation when the UF failed.
Bill


#121800 - 08/23/05 01:27 PM Re: Up On The Roof  
John Crighton  Offline
Member
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 177
Southern California
Judging from the corrosion on the straps, that "emergency" repair has been there a long time.

I don't think you can blame the PVC itself -- a properly cemented joint is as strong as the base material. (It says here on this can...)

It looks like maybe the S-curve might actually have been intentional, to mitigate the expansion effects. I wonder how much curvature you'd need to eliminate expansion joints? Would the wood sleepers eventually rub their way through the roof?


#121801 - 08/23/05 09:10 PM Re: Up On The Roof  
renosteinke  Offline
Cat Servant
Member
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 5,316
Blue Collar Country
A good illustration as to why our local code requires exposed conduit on roofs (like this) to have a ground wire....no matter what the material.



Member Spotlight
CDS
CDS
Nicholson Ga
Posts: 34
Joined: June 2006
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.018s Queries: 14 (0.003s) Memory: 0.7850 MB (Peak: 0.9366 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-07-23 18:42:37 UTC