ECN Electrical Forum - Discussion Forums for Electricians, Inspectors and Related Professionals
ECN Shout Chat
Top Posters(30 Days)
twh 10
Admin 4
Recent Posts
Windows 10, who's upgraded?
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 11:02 AM
How do you find a good employee?
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 10:58 AM
Recall notice: Bosch Solar panels
by ElectricianBud. 05/27/17 10:53 AM
Correct rotation, wrong sequence
by Potseal. 05/27/17 12:15 AM
Dryer, Range grounding from "Main" panel
by sparkync. 05/25/17 05:49 PM
New in the Gallery:
SE cable question
Popular Topics(Views)
236,907 Are you busy
171,915 Re: Forum
164,803 Need opinion
Who's Online Now
0 registered members (), 52 guests, and 9 spiders.
Key: Admin, Global Mod, Mod
Previous Thread
Next Thread
Print Thread
Rate This Thread
#118422 - 09/12/04 12:56 AM Horizontal Breaker Panel  
Admin  Offline

Administrator
Member
Joined: Oct 2000
Posts: 3,443
NY, USA
Quote
This is a picture of a Square-D "All-in-1" service panel. As you can see, it is impossible to mount this panel so that all the breakers will have "down" as the "off" position.

It doesn't appear very old. When did the NEC first mandate that "down" was "off?" When did they stop making these panels?

- John Steinke
[Linked Image]


Tools for Electricians:

#118423 - 09/12/04 07:02 PM Re: Horizontal Breaker Panel  
iwire  Offline
Moderator
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,391
North Attleboro, MA USA
Is it possible this panel was made for Canada?

I would have thought the up is on code has been around longer than the panel in the picture.

Regardless of how it is made I would say this is a direct violation 240.81 and no breakers should have been installed in the top row.

Bob


Bob Badger
Construction & Maintenance Electrician
Massachusetts

#118424 - 09/14/04 06:11 AM Re: Horizontal Breaker Panel  
pauluk  Offline
Member
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 7,520
Norfolk, England
I've been reading through sections of the 1971 NEC that I acquired, and have actually just reached 240 on overcurrent protection.

The current NEC's 240.80 thru 240.82 seem to have all been covered under 240-25 in 1971.

240-25(c) says that breakers must indicate whether they are in the open or closed position, but I can't see anything else about orientation.



Member Spotlight
Lostazhell
Lostazhell
Bakersfield, CA (Originally Orange Co.)
Posts: 1,429
Joined: February 2004
Show All Member Profiles 
Featured:

2017 NEC and Related
2017 NEC
Now Available!

Shout Box
Powered by UBB.threads™ PHP Forum Software 7.6.0
Page Time: 0.013s Queries: 14 (0.002s) Memory: 0.7521 MB (Peak: 0.8755 MB) Zlib enabled. Server Time: 2017-05-28 01:04:52 UTC